Naming Rights Agreements in Esports

In recent years, more and more non-endemic brands have decided to support esports players and esports organizations. One of the perks the esports sponsors usually receive is the installation of the company logo or name on the pro jersey. 

Unfortunately, broadcasting esports matches is vastly different from traditional sports competitions. When you watch sports broadcasts, you can clearly observe the athletes and their jerseys. However, most esports matches usually only show in-game events, which of course does not include the player. Players are rarely highlighted, and so their jerseys are also not often displayed. To work around this problem, most companies looking to sponsor an esports team opt to use naming sponsorships. As a result, the company’s name will be integrated and clearly displayed in the team name.

The History of Naming Rights Contracts in Esports

By 2020, the esports industry’s revenue is estimated to be nearly $1 billion USD. Sponsorships and media rights contribute to almost 75% of this total revenue. Furthermore, for most esports organizations, sponsors often contribute to almost all of their income and finances. According to Gaming Street, on average, about 90% of an esports organization’s total revenue comes from sponsorships.

Of course, all these sponsoring companies have their own set of goals they want to achieve from the collaboration. Based on the study called Sponsorship in Esports, most companies that sponsor esports organizations usually seek long-term goals such as building a reputation among esports fans. Short-term goals like increasing sales are usually not the primary motive behind these esports sponsors.

Indeed, being an esports sponsor will boost their popularity among the millennials and Gen Z, which are the large majority of the demographic of esports followers. According to another study titled Sponsoring Esports to Improve Brand Image, one-third of esports fans will usually prefer and perceive sponsoring brands more positively over non-sponsoring ones. Considering that today’s esports audience approximately reaches 474 million, sponsorship companies can effectively attract 158 million potential customers into their business.

The growth of esports viewership. | Source: Newzoo

Generally speaking, there are four types of sponsorship: media sponsors, promotional sponsors, in-kind sponsors, and financial sponsors. Media sponsors deal with secure advertising for an event through television, newspapers, or digital channels (such as websites and blogs). Promotional sponsors are similar to media sponsors. However, promotional sponsors usually involve only a single person with a large network of followers rather than a whole media outlet.

In-kind sponsors are usually businesses which can provide goods or services. Beverage brands, for instance, can become an in-kind sponsor by providing drinks to the viewers, tournaments officials, players, etc. The last and perhaps the most common form of sponsorship is financial sponsorship. As the name implies, financial sponsors will provide direct financial support or funds for the tournament, event, or organization they sponsor.

As mentioned previously, one of the perks that esports teams can offer to their sponsors is displaying the sponsor’s logo or name on the players’ jerseys. But, of course, we already knew the limitations of this approach. Therefore, some companies prefer to become name sponsors (or sometimes called title sponsors) and combine their brand name with the esports team name. After all, the name of the esports team will always be mentioned and displayed in the esports competition broadcast. So, by becoming the naming sponsor of the esports team, companies can exponentially increase their exposure towards consumers — especially esports audiences. So far, there are several esports organizations that have signed naming rights contracts with brands, both endemic and non-endemic.

Kia Motor is the name sponsor of DAMWON Gaming. | Source: Esports Insider

An example of an esports organization with a name sponsor is DAMWON Gaming, a South Korean organization that won the League of Legends World Championship in 2020. In December 2020, DAMWON announced its naming rights deal with Kia Motor starting in 2021, changing its team name to DWG MCH. DAMWON also introduced a new logo and jersey for their League of Legends team. Hyugho Kwon, Head of Korea Business Division in Kia Motors, explained that they wanted to “revitalize” the global esports ecosystem through the partnership with DAMWON. Kia Motors also wishes to promote and expose the brand to esports fans around the world.

Another esports organization that recently signed a naming rights contract is JD Gaming. The organization is part of the esports division of Jing Dong, an e-commerce company from China. The company that sponsored JD Gaming is Intel. The naming rights agreement, which lasts for two years, effectively changes JD Gaming’s brand name to JDG Intel Esports Club. Unfortunately, we have no information about the cost of purchasing JD Gaming’s name contract. 

Team SoloMid (TSM) has also just signed a naming rights contract in early June 2021 with a cryptocurrency exchange company from Hong Kong called Future Exchange (FTX). The partnership between TSM and FTX is reported to last for 10 years and is valued at US$210 million. TSM now undergoes with the brand name of TSM FTX. Again, FTX conducted this partnership in the hopes of marketing the brand to the American public.

Aerowolf’s partnership with Genflix. | Source: Twitter

In Indonesia, there is also an esports team that has signed a naming rights contract. The esports organization is Aerowolf. In May 2019, Aerowolf announced that Genflix, a local video streaming platform, had officially become their naming sponsor and changed its brand name from Aerowolf Roxy to Genflix Aerowolf. Just like FTX and most other name sponsors, Genflix’s goal behind collaborating with Aerowolf is to increase its brand awareness, especially towards the younger esports audience.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Naming Rights Agreements

Every company wants to have a popular and good brand reputation. In the midst of intense competition, having a positive brand image can be a massive game-changer in terms of generating revenue. And, of course, sponsorship is an easy and effective method to boost a brand’s reputation. Thus, many companies today who look into marketing their brand towards the younger demography will more often than not turn into sponsorships in esports.

According to Winnan, sponsoring events and teams are currently the best option in esports sponsorships. However, out of all of the aforementioned types of sponsorships, which one should you pick if you are looking to be an esports sponsor?

Naming or title sponsorships does look like the best option. After all, we already discussed why naming rights contracts are considered a far more superior form of sponsorship in esports. Other than the increased exposure in tournament broadcasts, naming sponsorships usually have a higher chance of capturing the loyalty of the fans. In a book entitled The eSports Market and eSports Sponsoring, author Julian Heinz Anton Stroh states that most esports fans are aware that companies that sponsor their favorite teams have goals of their own self-interest, such as increasing sales. However, fans also know that the esports industry needs sponsors to survive, which is why they often appreciate and care deeply about the support that sponsors provide.

Esports fans have high enthusiasm. | Source: ESTNN

Various studies also show that fans still gladly welcome non-endemic brands (companies that are not related to esports or gaming) to support the competitive gaming scene. Although most esports followers do slightly prefer sponsorships from endemic brands, the study by Stroh shows that 70% of esports fans still hope that more and more non-endemic brands will enter the esports scene.

Being an esports sponsor does improve the brand image in the eyes of esports fans. However, several other factors also affect the company’s reputation in a sponsorship deal, such as the activation method used by sponsors, the target audience, and the products offered by the company.

It is undeniable that the esports community is incredibly enthusiastic. If a sponsor can successfully “win the hearts” of esports fans, its brand will be vastly promoted on social media. Unfortunately, the enthusiasm of esports fans can also act as a double-edged sword. A slight fault or mistake in a sponsor’s message towards fans can spread bad reputation like wildfire. This fact also applies to naming rights contracts.

Naming rights contracts a form of partnership with the highest associativity since brand names are effectively combined together. Therefore, if either party is exposed to a scandal, the other will also be extensively affected. For example, if an esports team is caught in a cheating accusation, both the esports organization and the name sponsor will suffer from reputation damage.

The primary goal of name sponsor brands is often to get fans to associate their brand with the team. However, naming rights contracts sometimes don’t last long. And if the team name frequently changes, fans will eventually feel indifferent towards name sponsors. Another possibility that might occur is that fans will only remember the old name sponsor over new ones.

According to a Chron report, this exact scenario has occurred at Candlestick Park, the stadium of the San Francisco 49ers and San Francisco Giants. The stadium was initially named Candlestick Park in 1960. In 1995-2002, the stadium’s name was changed to 3Com Park. The name of the stadium changed again in 2004-2008 to Monster Park. However, today, most fans still associate the stadium name as Candlestick Park despite the two name modifications that took place. A simple solution to this problem that name sponsors can employ is to extend the name contract duration, similar to the partnership between TSM and FTX. 

Team SoloMid has just signed a naming rights agreement with FTX. | Source: Dot Esports

Naming rights partnerships are similar to company takeovers in the business world. Both of them have the potential to be profitable or yield extreme losses for both parties. A company acquisition or takeover is considered successful when the acquired company can contribute revenue greater than the initial purchase value. Take Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram in 2012 as an example. Although Facebook initially bought Instagram for $1 billion USD, Instagram today has more than 1 billion users and contributes over $20 billion to Facebook’s revenue each year.

However, startups or small companies do not always want to accept takeover offers. Sometimes, these companies may believe that they can independently grow into a business with a larger value than the acquisition price. An example of a company that resisted large corporate takeovers is Discord. Microsoft had offered $12 billion USD to acquire Discord. However, according to a Bloomberg report, Discord refused and instead look into the opportunity to go public in the future.

All these plus and minuses in company takeovers are also present in naming rights contracts. The deal between TSM and FTX, for instance, lasts for 10 years and is worth $210 million USD. Therefore, we can assume that the TSM brand is currently valued at $210 million USD. However, TSM might become more popular in the future, and their brand value might increase, favoring FTX. However, there is also a possibility that the performance and popularity of the TSM organization might decline over the next 10 years, which will cause FTX huge losses since their contract value decreases.

Naming Rights Contracts in Conventional Sports

Naming rights agreements are also a common occurrence in the conventional sports world. For example, several basketball teams in Indonesia have sold their naming rights to sponsors. One of these Indonesian basketball teams with a name sponsor is Satria Muda. 

Since its establishment in 1993, Satria Muda has signed naming rights contracts with several brands. In 1997, Coca-Cola Company’s AdeS brand became the first name sponsor of this Jakarta-based basketball team. As a result, the team name was changed to AdeS Satria Muda. A year later, in 1998, the team name changed again to Mahaka Satria Muda after signing a deal with PT Abdi Bangsa Tbk owned by Erick Tohir. In 2004, BRI through BritAma became the next name sponsor of the Satria Muda team, altering the team name to Satria Muda BritAma. The Satria Muda headquarters was also named The BritAma Arena as a result of the agreement. However, in 2015, Satria Muda signed their last and current name sponsor with Pertamina. Along with this change, the basketball team’s name was changed to Satria Muda Pertamina.

Another national basketball team that also has a name sponsor is Amartha Hangtuah. When it was initially founded in 2003, the basketball team undergoes by the name Hangtuah and only modified it to Hangtuah Sumsel Indonesia Muda five years later. This name was used until 2019 when Amartha decided to become the name sponsor of HangTuah. After the partnership, the basketball team became known as Amartha Hangtuah.

Amartha is currently HangTuah’s name sponsor. | Source: Kompas

Of course, not all sports teams are willing to sell the exclusive naming rights of their team. European football clubs, for instance, rarely sell the club’s naming rights and instead opt to sell the naming rights of their stadiums. For example, the Emirates airline bought the naming rights to Arsenal’s stadium in 2004. It is estimated that this 15-year contract between the two parties is worth £100 million. The deal also includes the installation of Emirates’ logo in the Arsenal player jerseys since the 2006-2007 season. Last year, Barcelona also just sold the naming rights of their stadium, Camp Nou, and donated the funds they receive to COVID-19 related charities. 

The main reason why most top-tier football clubs almost never give up their naming rights is that their club name is already “too well-known” to people around the world. Their club names, in some sense, are considered to be formally established. In contrast to the relatively new esports teams, most European football clubs are more than 100 years old. Four famous clubs in the UK were founded before 1900: Arsenal in 1886, Liverpool in 1892, Manchester City in 1880, and Manchester United in 1878. Therefore, it is very unlikely that these clubs will surrender the longevity of their brand name to sponsors. And if they were to open up a naming sponsorship deal, the price that they would set would be incredibly expensive. Most sponsors can perhaps already get a reasonable amount of exposure in regular sponsorship agreements with football clubs and thus would never opt to become title sponsors even if there is an opportunity to do so.

Naming rights contracts are not limited to sports teams or esports organizations. Some companies are also willing to become naming sponsors of sports events or esports competitions. Toyota, for instance, became the naming sponsor of Thailand’s national football league called Toyota League Cup. In the realm of esports, Intel is undoubtedly one of the most well-known tournament name sponsors. Intel Extreme Masters and Intel Grand Slam are two examples of Intel-sponsored esports tournaments. In Indonesia, JD.id has also conducted a name sponsorship agreement with Yamisok’s esports league called the High School League. Like all other name sponsors, JD.id’s goal behind this partnership is to increase brand awareness among high school esports players and viewers

Conclusion

The world of business is full of intense competition as hundreds of brands try their best to win the market and rise to the top. One of the most effective methods for a company to beat its competitors is building a good brand reputation and image, which is why many of them opt to become sponsors of popular sports or esports teams.

Placing a logo or company name on a player’s jersey is one of the most basic forms of sponsorship in conventional sports or esports. However, companies can further increase their exposure by conducting a naming sponsorship deal with the organization. By becoming a name sponsor, fans will immediately associate the brand name with their favorite team. But, of course, name sponsorship agreements can have potential repercussions for both parties as well. If one of the sides is affected by an issue, the other might also be severely affected. Like all business decisions, there are always pros and cons that must be carefully considered. Nevertheless, when it comes to esports sponsorships, the current hot trend and deals are happening in naming rights agreements.

Featured image: Freepik. Translated by: Ananto Joyoadikusumo

The History of Dota 2 and The International: From a Fan-Made Mod to One of the Largest Esports in the Entire World

The local Dota 2 esports scene in Indonesia has been dying for the past few years. Simply put, mobile games are far more popular and successful in the country, which is why a majority of esports organizations left the PC gaming genre. Despite this, Dota 2 is still considered in many other countries to be the most superior game in the world. The International, for instance, consistently breaks the largest prize pool record in esports every single year. Furthermore, hundreds of thousands of players still actively play Dota 2, despite the game already being more than 8 years old.

Here’s the history of Dota 2 and how The International became the greatest global tournament in esports.

The History of Dota 2

It all started with Aeon of Strife, which is considered the first MOBA game. Aeon of Strife is a fan-made mod for StarCraft: Brood War. The mod became so popular that Blizzard included it in Warcraft 3. The gameplay and experience of playing Aeon of Strife are largely different from today’s MOBA game standards. However, Aeon of Strife follows the basic principles of most MOBAs. For example, the primary objective in Aeon of Strife is still to destroy the enemy base. In addition, the map also follows the three-lane layout of the MOBA map design. However, unlike most MOBAs out there, Aeon of Strife only has 4 players in each team instead of 5. There is also no PvP feature, as RedBull mentioned, so players can only fight against AIs.

Aeon of Strife is considered to be the first MOBA game. | Source: Hive Workship

If Aeon of Strife was the forerunner of the MOBA genre, Defense of the Ancients (DotA) is the game that pioneered Dota 2. Just like Aeon of Strife, DotA also originates as a mod. DotA was created as a mod for Warcraft 3 by a modder named Kyle “Eul” Sommer. The DotA mod is not very different from today’s version of Dota 2. In DotA, 10 players battle it out in 2 teams of 5 to destroy the enemy’s base. Despite the massive popularity of the DotA mod in the Warcraft community, Eul decided to leave the project behind. He also once tried to create a sequel to DotA, but this never came to fruition either. Ultimately, Eul handed the ownership of DotA to Valve.

The success of the DotA mod inspired many people to make their own version of the game. DotA: Allstars, for instance, is one of the twists that became very popular. DotA: Allstars was also created by a Warcraft modder, and his name is Steve “Guinsoo” Feak. This version of DotA is, by far, the closest resemblance to the Dota 2 game we all know today. In fact, many people even considered Allstars to be the original DotA mod since it is the version that is used in professional matches at that time.

After the success of Allstars, Guinsoo and Steve “Pendragon” Mescon — who created the DotA community center — soon joined Riot Games to assist them in developing League of Legends, and left DotA: Allstars in IceFrog’s hands. IceFrog undoubtedly has played a significant role in the entire history of DotA. Granted, he didn’t originally create Allstars or overhaul the mod, but he did create many new contents for Allstars after Guinsoo and Mescon left. Furthermore, IceFrog also ensures that the gameplay of Allstars remains balanced and that no characters are too overpowered.

At that time, DotA’s success can only happen because of the fans. The game was made by fans, for the fans, and was made big by the fans. However, things changed when League of Legends was launched in 2009 and Heroes of Newerth in 2010. The launch of these two games showed that the MOBA genre has great potential. If DotA wants to exist and compete with these two giants, it most certainly needs assistance from big gaming companies. 

Fortunately, Valve came to the rescue.

Valve partnered with IceFrog to create Dota 2.

In 2009, Valve announced that they will be teaming up with IceFrog. At that time, there were rumors that Valve wanted to develop a MOBA game through the partnership. However, it was only in 2010 that Valve revealed the Dota 2 project. A year later, in 2011, the beta version of Dota 2 was released and provided access to several media outlets. The beta development was a tremendous success, receiving an overall positive response from the beta testers.

Unfortunately, problems arose when Valve registered the word “DOTA” as a trademark in 2012. This decision marked the beginning of Valve’s extensive legal battle with Blizzard in the next few months. Although Blizzard did not trademark “DOTA”, they argued that the word (and its many spinoffs like DotA or Defense of the Ancients) has always been part of Blizzard and is synonymous with Warcraft. They also claimed that many of the DOTA mechanics are based on Blizzard’s Warcraft, since it is a mod of the game. Furthermore, many of the character designs in DOTA originates from Warcraft 3, according to a PC GAMER report.

Although it took several months, the legal battle between Valve and Blizzard was finally resolved. The two decided that they both have the right to use the “Defense of the Ancients” title according to their own needs. Valve will use the Dota name for its commercial products and franchises, including the Dota 2 game. On the other hand, according to Gamasutra, Blizzard will use the Dota name as a reference for its player-created content. After the fiasco, the Dota 2 development process continued smoothly. 

The Birth of The International

Valve held the first The International in 2011 in conjunction with Gamescom. Interestingly, at the time, Dota 2 was technically still in beta and was not officially launched yet. So, why did Valve hold The International? Marketing. Valve provided a total prize pool of US$1.6 million, making TI the biggest prize esports tournament of its time. No other esports tournament in history was able to put up a prize pool of this caliber, and thus many people was incredibly hyped for TI. Through this buzz, Valve hopes to introduce Dota 2 to a much wider community.

Eight teams around the world and from different regions were directly invited to take part in the first-ever TI. The tournament could be spectated live in Gamescom, held in Cologne, Germany. Valve also broadcasts TI matches online so that all fans in the world can watch. Fortunately for Valve, TI was a massive hit. They were able to market the game effectively, and soon thousands of gamers flock in to try out the Dota 2.

NaVi became the first The International champion. | Source: Navi.gg

In the next few months after TI 1, Valve also continues to distribute the beta version of Dota 2. And as the player count of the game increases, the esports scene also begins to take shape. Just like the original DotA, the Dota 2 esports were initially grown by the enthusiasm and loyalty of the fans. Therefore, most Dota 2 tournaments in the olden days (excluding TI) were relatively small-scale, having prize pools of only around $25,000 USD. Even so, this was the grassroots that became the foundation of the enormous Dota 2 esports ecosystem that we know today.

In 2012, Valve held The International for the second time. The prize pool of TI2 was the exact same as TI1, which was $1.6 million USD. However, TI was now held independently by Valve in Seattle, United States. The beta version of Dota 2 was also already open to the public during this time, which means that there are far more Dota 2 followers and enthusiasts expecting TI. Furthermore, the game has also undergone several updates, significantly increasing the hero pool. 

In July 2013, Valve officially launched Dota 2 on Steam, and the player count immediately skyrocketed. In June 2013, the average number of Dota 2 players only reached 210 thousand people. This figure rose to 237,000 in July and to 330.7 thousand in August. TI3 was also the start of the implementation of Valve’s crowdfunding system using the Battle Pass, and it was a major success. The International 3 prize pool was able to reach a record high of $2.8 million USD, $1.2 million more than the previous two TIs.

Since the colossal success of TI3, Valve continued to use take advantage of Battle Passes in increasing the TI prize pool. As a result, the TI prize pool has never declined even once. Last year, an Arab prince outstandingly spent over IDR 588 million in the TI10 Battle Pass. Thanks to him and hundreds of thousands of Dota 2 players, The International 10 prize pool was, yet again, able to break records and reach the $40 million USD milestone.

The growth of TI prize pools from year to year is quite massive, to say the least. For instance, The International 4 has a prize pool of around $10 million USD. 2 years later, TI6 doubled this figure and crossed the $20 million USD mark. The International 9 became the first TI with a total prize pool of more than $30 million USD.

The International Prize from year to year. | Data source: Esports Earnings

As you can see in the table above, there has been a huge spike in The International’s prize pool several times. The biggest jump occurred at The International 9, with an increase of $8.8 million USD. The difference between the TI4 and TI5 prize pool is also fairly significant. The consistent rise of The International prize goes to show how the Dota 2 community still wants to support the professional esports scene of the game. However, The International’s huge prize pool also poses its own problems.

Let’s now move to discuss the top teams that have won this prestigious tournament. Out of the 9 TIs that have been held, only one team was able to win it twice. That team is OG, which managed to win TI8 and TI9. Remarkably, they also won both consecutive TIs with the exact same composition of players. 

Here’s the OG roster that won TI8 and TI9:

Anathan “ana” Pham

Topias “Topson” Taavitsainen

Sebastien “Ceb” Debs

Jesse “JerAx” Vainikka

Johan “N0tail” Sundstein – captain

And here is a list of teams that have won The International:

2011 – Natus Vincere

2012 – Invictus Gaming

2013 – Alliance

2014 – Newbee

2015 – Evil Geniuses

2016 – Wings Gaming

2017 – Team Liquid

2018 – OG

2019 – OG

Prize pools are not the only way to measure the success of a particular tournament. Two other important factors, namely viewership numbers and watch time, can also be considered. According to data from Esports Charts, both the average number of viewers and watch hours of The International experiences an upward trend in the last four years. At TI7, the average viewer count only reached 418 thousand. This figure rose to 537.7 thousand in TI8 and to 738.9 thousand in TI9. In terms of watch time, TI7 only manages to obtain 44.3 million watch hours. In TI8, the total hours watched reached 63.9 million hours, and in TI9, that number rose to 88.4 million hours.

The watch hours of TI from TI7 to TI9. | Source: Esports Charts

 

Peak viewership numbers from TI7 to TI9. | Data source: Esports Charts

Unfortunately, these upward trends cannot be applied to the number of active Dota 2 players. Let’s try to observe the graph from Steam Charts of Dota 2’s player count since its launch in 2013.

Average and peak number of Dota 2 players.| Data source: Steam Charts

From July 2012 to July 2014, there is a general rise in the monthly player count of Dota 2. In September 2014, the player count plummeted before increasing again to 629 thousand in February 2015. Throughout its history, Dota 2’s record for the highest average number of active players was 709 thousand, which occurred in February 2016. Around the same time, Dota 2 also recorded its peak number of players, which was 1.29 million.

Since then, the average player count of the game experience a general decline, eventually reaching its lowest point in April 2018, where only 430 thousand people are playing Dota 2. However, in 2019, Dota 2 seems to have had a minor resurgence in its player base. In January of that year, the average player count was 476,000. Around 6 months later, this figure continued to rise, reaching a high of 500 thousand players. Unfortunately, the upward trend did not last, and another drought occurred in Dota 2’s player count.

At this point, many people thought that Dota 2 was officially dying and that the game’s player base will never be able to grow again. Then, the COVID-19 pandemic hit and became one of the reasons why Dota 2 experienced yet another surge in its player count. An in April of 2020, the average player number of Dota 2 hit its peak of 500 thousand players.

The Dota 2 esports scene in Indonesia

“The Dota 2 community in Indonesia today is vastly different when compared to 2014-2017,” said Yudi Anggi, a Dota 2 shoutcaster known as “Justincase”. However, this doesn’t mean that the state today’s community is worse than before. “The difference is, in the past, there were many local Dota 2 tournaments. Today, however, almost no local tournaments exist in Indonesia.,” he said when contacted by Hybrid.co.id via text message.

“But unlike the olden days, content creation in the local Dota 2 community has never been this thriving. Therefore, you can’t really say that the current state of Dota 2 in Indonesia is dead; it is simply in a different era,” said Yudi. Indeed, there are many professional players today who are actively broadcasting, such as Rusman, inYourDream. “Many fans in Indonesia today are spoiled for choice when it comes viewing live Dota 2 content,” he said. “Through these streams, we can only hope that the local Dota 2 community will continue to grow and perhaps one day experience a renaissance.”

Yudi “Justincase” Anggi. | Source: Facebook

Yudi explained that Saweria is one of the reasons why many people became interested and dived into the world of content creation. Saweria provides a simple and trusted system that allows viewers to donate to their favorite streamers. “Fans who watch the stream can be very generous in providing support to their favorite streamers,” said Yudi. “As a result, streamers become motivated to create content and entertain their viewers. In the end, this is an overall win for the entire Dota 2 community.

In a Hybrid.co.id interview with the Co-founder of Saweria, Natalia, she said that the 10 biggest receivers of support funds in Saweria are all gaming content creators. Through Saweria, some people can even generate up to IDR 44 million every month through donations alone.

On the flip side, Gary Ongko Putera, founder and CEO of BOOM Esports, has a different perspective from Yudi regarding the Dota 2 community in the country. Gary believes that the Dota 2 community in Indonesia can be quite toxic or misbehaved, which is why he is often reluctant to pay attention to them. For instance, people in the local spectrum love to support the enemy team, despite having a national team competing in the same esports tournament. “People here can be often lazy when it comes to supporting teams or players from our own country,” Gary said.

Even so, Gary still has some hope in the survival of the local Dota 2 esports ecosystem. “Luckily, Indonesia still has AG (Army Geniuses-red). As long as some organizations continue to invest in Dota 2, the local esports system will not die out,” said Gary. “I really do believe that many Indonesian Dota 2 players are incredibly talented. However, they still need proper coaching and facilities to unlock their potential and be able to fully live off of Dota 2.” Dota 2 can really be a legitimate and viable pro career option if these standards are met.

Regarding the future of the esports ecosystem, Yudi’s opinions are inlined with Gary’s. He also feels that there is still hope in the local Dota 2 esports ecosystem. However, if someone wants to become a pro Dota 2 player, he/she must be ready to face all the challenges that exist. “Because there are no local tournaments, players who want to become professionals must take their talents directly to the international arena,” said Yudi. “If they manage to find some success in SEA regional tournaments, many opportunities will eventually open up. There are still countless organizations abroad that are scouting for talents across the world. And if you skilled and lucky enough, they might just pick you up.”

Consequently, Yudi highly suggests that having decent English communication skills is imperative when it comes to getting hired by international esports organizations. “There are simply far more jobs in Dota 2 abroad, and being able to speak English can be the dealbreaker that determines if you will get or lose the job.”

The Dota 2 BOOM team won the ESL Indonesia Championship Season 2. | Source: Twitter

According to Gary, many esports organizations have a hard time scouting new talents due to the lack of local tournaments. “Scouting new players is incredibly difficult today,” said Gary. “But fortunately, we did well for ourselves. We can often attract talents outside of Indonesia. The reputation of our esports ecosystem is actually not that bad globally, thanks to the achievements of our Dota 2 and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive teams.”

Garry also added that Indonesian esports organization provides one of the largest basic salaries when compared to other countries in the SEA region. This might be the selling point for gamers who are looking to get a career in professional Dota 2. “You can definitely earn a lot if you can become a top player. To be honest, all the best players in all games have large incomes. Unfortunately, in Dota 2, the skill ceiling is incredibly high when compared to other MOBA games. Reaching the pinnacle of the Dota 2 skill level will undoubtedly take a significant amount of work, time, and experience.

Previously, the Editor-in-Chief of Hybrid.co.id, Yabes Elia, once discussed how passion is no longer enough when pursuing a career in the world of esports. However, it is undeniable that passion maintains the longevity of the people who invest in esports. Gary and Yudi are some examples of these kinds of people. Both of them decided to stay in the Dota 2 esports ecosystem because they love and are truly passionate about the game. From a business standpoint, they could have easily migrated into the much more thriving mobile esports ecosystem. However, as Gary put it, running an esports organization would be difficult if we only focus on the business aspect.

“For me, the principle is not that complicated. Without Dota 2/CS:GO, BOOM wouldn’t have existed in the first place,” said Gary, explaining the reason why he kept the Dota 2 team. “I am truly passionate about Dota 2 and CS:GO. And it would be difficult to run a purely business-focused BOOM without my passion in mind.” He admitted that he really likes complex games. And according to him, Dota 2 is one of the most difficult games in the entire world. “No offense to other video games, but Dota 2 is far more superior in terms of complexity and depth. There are stacking mechanics, pulling creeps, proper itemizations, and tons of other minute details to learn. For the old guys like me who are more accustomed to watching complex games, I was never excited to play the simpler games of the modern era.”

Although Gary is passionate about Dota 2, he also takes into account the business side when considering his decisions. When asked whether the Dota 2 team was profitable for BOOM, Gary answered, “From a business perspective, of course, it is profitable because we frequently get to play on the international stage. However, admittedly, our profit is not that crazy large.”

On the other hand, Yudi revealed that his reason for staying loyal to shoutcasting Dota 2 was due to a matter of preference. “Honestly, I don’t really like mobile games. And I wouldn’t be able to give it my all if I was shoutcasting a game I didn’t like,” he said. “I really have to understand and be passionate about the game to give my best performance during a broadcast. If I like the game, I will be enthusiastic to study and dig up information about the game and its esports scene, which are the primary subject of discussion when I do my shoutcasting.”

In the end, as Yudi concluded, it shouldn’t really matter if someone decides to stay in Dota 2 or shift to the more popular mobile esports scene. “It goes back to each person. If someone wants to find a larger income, then go ahead and migrate to mobile esports. It is their right to choose, after all,” he said. “For me, personally, my Dota 2 career is enough to support myself financially. Although my life is not glamorous by any standards, I feel incredibly fortunate to work in the field I truly love.”

Conclusion

Eight years since its launch, Dota 2 is still played by hundreds of thousands of people around the world, which proves Valve’s effort in popularizing the game. Developing the esports ecosystem is one of Valve’s go-to methods when it comes to marketing Dota 2. Even though The International’s audience is still much lower than that of the League of Legends World Championship, TI’s huge prize pool never fails to attract public and media attention. 

In Indonesia, the current state of the Dota 2 esports ecosystem has drastically changed from the old era. The bad news with the change is that local tournaments are almost non-existent. Fortunately, the good news is that there are still quite a few local esports organizations that invest in Dota 2. For this reason, Indonesians who aspire to become pros still have a chance to realize their dreams. However, they must be fully ready to compete, at the very least, in the regional stage.

Featured Image: Imgur. Translated by: Ananto Joyoadikusumo

Comparing the Olympics With Esports Tournaments: Which One Is More Profitable?

In recent years, the popularity of esports has skyrocketed. Even so, there is still a negative stigma attached to the competitive gaming industry. The participation of esports in major sporting events — such as the SEA Games or the Asian Games — can undoubtedly help remove this stigma. Furthermore, the emergence of esports in traditional sports competitions, such as the National Sports Week (PON) or the President’s Cup, can also increase public awareness of esports.

The Olympics is widely regarded as the most prestigious sporting event in the entire world. Previously, Hybrid.co.id had discussed if esports deserves a spot in the Olympics. This time, however, I will compare the process of organizing the Olympics with world-class esports events such as The International and League of Legends Worlds. Through our analysis, we can try to observe if there are any similarities that suggest that esports and the Olympics can be juxtaposed.

Preparation of the Olympics

Even though the Olympics only takes place for 16 days, preparing for the event can take years of effort. The preparation process begins by selecting a hosting country. For instance, the application to host the 2020 Olympics (which will be held in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic) started in May 2011. At that time, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) informed each country’s National Olympic Committees (NOCs) that they could apply to host the 2020 Olympics

In June 2011, the Governor of Tokyo applied as the 2020 Olympic host. Besides Tokyo, several other cities also volunteered, such as Istanbul, Madrid, Baku, Doha, and Rome. However, Tokyo finally took the spot and signed the host contract in September 2013.

As you can see, preparing for the Olympics can take a very long time since the host selection can take 7-12 years before the event starts. In the 2022 Winter Olympics, Beijing was selected as the host in July 2015. Paris, the 2024 Olympics host, got the spot in September 2017. The Olympic Committee intentionally gave this much time due to the tremendous effort required to host the Olympic event successfully.

As a host, the city must not only build an athlete village to accommodate Olympic participants but also build or repair a stadium to run the sporting events. Moreover, the government must also improve the city’s infrastructure, ensuring a warm welcome to the audience, tourists and Olympic personnels that will visit the city.

This year, Tokyo prepared more than 41 thousand hotel rooms for the media, IOC executives, NOC representatives, and representatives of the International Sports Federations (ISF). They also need to take into account the hotels that will accommodate the tourists. Prior to the pandemic, the Tokyo government planned to set up cruise ships in Tokyo ports as temporary hotels. However, the plan was ultimately canceled due to the lack of spectators who watched this year’s Olympics in person.

As for the athletes, Tokyo needs to build an Olympic village, or often called an athletes village. Building this accommodation can be extremely challenging due to the due to the hefty list of conditions that must be met. For example, the location of the village must be close to the stadium or the location of the competition venue. The farthest distance from an athlete’s accommodation to the stadium is set at approximately 50 kilometers and is reachable in 1 hour by car. If there just so happens to be multiple competition venues that are far apart from each other, well the host city must also prepare multiple athlete villages. During the 2014 Winter Olympics, Russia created two separate athlete villages. The primary athlete village was located in Sochi. The second athlete village was in Roza Khutor, built for ski and snowboarding athletes.

Preparation of Esports Events

Now that we have already a basic understanding of the intricacies behind preparing for the Olympics, let’s see what tournament organizers (TO) have to deal with when formulating an esports competition. To be able to fully grasp the process of organizing esports competitions, Hybrid.co.id contacted Herry Wijaya, Head of Operations, Mineski Indonesia, and Irliansyah Wijanarko, Chief Growth Officer, RevivalTV. These two individuals have years of profound experience in organizing esports events.

Besides Herry and Irli, Hybrid.co.id also contacted ESL, one of the most popular tournament organizing brands in esports. ESL frequently held large-scale international esports tournaments around the world. Nick Vanzetti, SVP and Managing Director of ESL Asia Pacific Japan, specifically represented ESL in the interview.

Herry said that to hold a national-level esports competition usually requires 3-6 months of preparation. International tournaments often take double the effort and time, around 6-12 months. According to Irli, preparing large-scale esports events such as The International or LOL Worlds would take around 8-12 months.

“On average, the preparation time is around 8-12 months. The planning and conceptualization phase consumes 3-4 months of work, detailing usually takes 2-3 months long, while promotions will start 2-3 months before the event runs,” said Irli via text message. “Of course, execution and post-event tasks come next.” He added, “World-class esports events often focus on capturing the best moments of the competition and providing an unforgettable experience for the audience. So what’s the job of the tournament organizer? Create as many of these moments as possible.”

“What are these so-called ‘moments’? For the casual audience, they might be interested in creative stage acts/design and entertaining content. On the other hand, the more hardcore fans might seek a suspenseful finals match with a popular or iconic caster. For those with EO experience, they might want to see a smoothly running and coordinated event,” said Irli.

When it comes to holding esports events, Irli explained that four stakeholders or groups must be considered. These are the players/talents, audiences, sponsors, and developers or IP owners. The crew that runs behind the curtains must also be taken into account. Depending on the scale of the competition, additional stakeholders, such as the government or competing companies, might also be involved.

“Tournament organizers must carefully analyze each of these potential stakeholders and how they might find the event memorable (in a positive sense). Different stakeholders, of course, have different needs and priorities. For the crew, they might want good food and hotel accommodation. Talents might require an organized script to simplify things on stage. The audience will undoubtedly want a high-quality production with proper visuals and sound mixing. Sponsors need to make sure that their KPI targets are met. So on and so forth.”

According to Herry, here are the most important elements to prepare and plan when organizing a tournament: 

  1. Venues and mandatories
  2. Hard production and soft production
  3. Property
  4. Production equipment
  5. Hospitality
  6. Talents
  7. Internet and communication
  8. Other miscellaneous items, such as stationaries or hard disks

Mandatories are essentially everything that will be required when using a venue,” said Herry. “For example, if we want to use Tennis Indoor Stadium in Senayan, we have to assemble a fire department and prepare an ambulance, according to their standard procedures. Furthermore, we also have to prepare a crowd permit.” He also added that there are two types of production equipment. Hard production involves stages, booths, gates, and everything physical or tangible. On the other hand, Soft production deals with tools required to create digital content, such as digital assets. Hospitality encompasses hotels, food, and transportation arrangements.

LAN Events. | Source: ESL Gaming

Esports competitions are frequently sponsored by endemic brands, such as smartphone companies for mobile esports competitions or hardware manufacturers for PC esports tournaments. Sponsors can opt to give away their products to resell, while sometimes they can also lend them. It all depends on the signed contract.

“Sponsors often supply their products or services instead of finances to support the event. We call them In-kind sponsors. Sometimes, the sponsors can allow us to resell the items they provide,” said Herry. “Other times, it is only a matter of a lease, and we would have to return the sponsor’s product after the event has concluded. It is incredibly important to understand the product’s presence to make sure that we do not get into any illegal circumstances.”

In line with Herry and Irli, Nick revealed that ESL takes about a year to organize a world-class esports event. He also added that workloads significantly increase when the D day of the event gets closer.

“There is a lot of preparation to be made to hold an international event,” said Vanzetti. “First, we have to find a venue that fits our criteria and needs regarding the size of the event.” He revealed that capacity, internet availability, location, and reachability are some of the factors that ESL considers when selecting a venue.

“We will also ensure that players, talents, ESL employees, and all parties that will be attending and running the tournament are set up with the appropriate accommodations and travel needs such as visas, flight tickets, hotels, and so on,” said Vanzetti. He emphasized that ESL highly prioritizes ensuring that all parties involved in organizing esports competitions have a satisfying experience, starting from when they depart, running the event, and until they return to their respective homes.

LOL Worlds 2020 will be held in Shanghai. | Source: LOL Esports

How does a tournament organizer determine the city that will host the international esports competition? According to Herry, TOs usually adjust to the client’s goals and expectations. If the client’s goal is to reach out to their fans, then Mineski will select a city with a highly enthusiastic community in the game. On the flipside, Mineski will recommend a new city that has little to no fanbase if the client wishes to expand their gaming market to new consumers.

Vanzetti also mentioned that the size of the market or community surrounding the city is one of ESL’s primary benchmarks when determining a host location. However, another factor that ESL often takes into consideration is the local government’s interest in esports.

“The hosting city can frequently provide support to the tournament or event through various methods. For instance, they can help us get visas for the players and staff. They can also assist the marketing department or aid the venue rental or accommodation costs,” said Vanzetti. “Through the bidding system, TOs will be able to select cities that offer strategic advantages and benefits so that they can successfully organize a world-class esports event.”

However, according to Irli, the only publisher that currently uses a bidding system in choosing a city to hold an esports competition is Valve. He explained that Valve gave event organizers the opportunity to submit proposals for holding a Major tournament. It is the organizers themselves who will propose the city to be the tournament host.

“From my experience, the factors that need to be considered when organizing national and international scale events are the facilities in the city, the number of players in and around the city, accessibility to the city, such as airports, hotels, distance to the venue,” said Iril. “Product support from sponsors in the city, political conditions, and enthusiasm from local communities are also quite important.”

Tournament organizers must also be able to manage manpower or human resources (HR). According to Herry, 40 to 60 personnel are usually required to hold an online competition. This figure can expand to 80-120 people if the tournament is held offline. Moreover, to hold an international offline competition, Herry estimates that only a minimum of 150-170 people will suffice. However, not all the organizer crew is composed of Mineski’s personnel. More often than not, some are part of the “familia”, freelancers who continue to work for Mineski.

On ESL, the manpower size is even larger, usually involving more than 200 staff and contract workers according to Vanzetti. “In addition to hiring ESL staff, we often collaborate with local suppliers and companies to help us organize events,” he said. In Irli’s estimation, an organizing team holding world-class esports events like The International or LOL Worlds can approximately accumulate 200-300 staff in all positions. The number of required staff is usually correlated with the venue size and location as well.

“The bigger the event and venue, the larger the staff size needed to run the whole show, up to 500-600 people,” he said. “Fortunately, the costs of labor can often be reduced through volunteers or freelancers who are paid hourly or per day.” He used the Djakarta Warehouse Project (DWP), arguably Indonesia’s largest music, as a comparison. He said that DWP’s organizing crew can consist of a total of 1000 personnel. However, the core team usually consists of only 50-100 people. The rest of the crew is filled with volunteers and freelancers who look to support the event.

Olympic Viewership Trends and Esports Competitions

Viewership can be a barometer of the success of a particular event. Unfortunately, when it comes to comparing the successes of the Olympics and esports tournaments, viewership can be a tricky metric to handle. The reason is simple: these two events are broadcasted in different media. 

Unlike TV, there is no such thing as ratings in streaming broadcasts. Instead, the average or peak number of viewers and watch hours are more relevant statistics when it comes to streaming. Therefore, in order to compare the Olympic viewership with TI and LOL Worlds, we need to consider the viewership statistics in each of the events and observe any general trends (upwards or downwards) that might be present.

In the United States, the Olympics are usually broadcast by NBC (National Broadcasting Company). According to data from Nielsen, 16.9 million people watch the Tokyo Olympics opening ceremony. If we compare this figure with the viewer numbers in previous years, 2021 holds the unwanted record of the smallest number of viewers. Furthermore, Tokyo Olympics viewership numbers were half of Rio de Janeiro’s Olympics spectator numbers in 2016. NBC, unfortunately, might regret their $7.65 billion USD Olympics broadcast rights contract extension that lasts until 2032 after facing this downward trend.

Here’s the Tokyo Olympics viewership numbers compared to the five-day Rio Olympics:

Tuesday, 27 July 2021, viewership dropped by 58%

Wednesday, July 28, 2021, viewership dropped by 53%

Thursday, July 29, 2021, viewership dropped by 43%

Saturday, July 31, 2021, viewership dropped by 57%

Sunday, August 1, 2021, viewership dropped by 51%

As you can see from the data above, the drop in viewers in the Tokyo Olympics is catastrophic. According to an AP News report, the peak viewership of the Tokyo Olympics broadcasted on NBC occurred on Thursday, July 29, 2021, which was 16.2 viewers. Even so, this figure is still 43% lower than that of the Rio Olympics 4 years ago.

NBC Universal CEO Jeff Shell hypothesized several factors that caused the plunge in this year’s Olympic broadcast. One of the most obvious factor is the pandemic, which ultimately postponed the Olympics by a whole year. The pandemic also prohibited live spectators who want to watch the event in person. Another factor is the adjustment of broadcast hours. The time difference between Tokyo and Washington DC is a whopping 13 hours. To combat this problem, NBC and other media companies offer broadcasts from more platforms and more schedules. However, according to Reuters, this actually confuses the viewers and hinders them from finding the content they want to watch.

Now, let’s move on to the viewership of The International and LOL Worlds. 

I will use the most common metrics or measure of viewership, namely hours watched, the average number of viewers, and the peak number of viewers. For my source of data, I referred to Esports Charts. As a side note, The International 2020 had to be postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the statistics for this year’s International will be intentionally left out as 0.

Watch hours, peak viewers, and average viewership numbers of TI and LOL Worlds. | Source: Esports Charts]

As you can see in the chart above, The International’s viewership continues to show an upward trend across all metrics in the past few years. The viewership number of LOL Worlds also seems to follow the same exact trend. During 2019 in particular, the average number of viewers even experienced rapid growth, almost 60% greater than the last year. However, in terms of peak viewers and hours watched, LOL Worlds’ figures occasionally stagnate or decline marginally.

You can also see the viewership for LOL Worlds 2020 and The International 2019 in the diagrams below.

Viewership statistics of LOL Worlds 2020. | Source: Esports Charts
Viewership statistics of The International 2019. | Source: Esports Charts

Of course, the Olympics’ viewership numbers are far more superior to any esports events in history. However, esports has one other advantage over the Olympics: a younger demographic of viewers. As of 2016, the average age of an Olympic spectator was 53 years old. On the other hand, the average age of an esports audience is 26 years old. If you want to understand what this data suggests, you can take a look at this article here.

Profitability

Besides viewership, another metric that can be used to measure the success of a particular event is its ability to yield financial gain, or profitability for short. So let’s take a deeper look at the detailed costs involved in running the Olympics and esports events as well as the advantages/disadvantages of the host city.

The financial resources prepared by different host cities to hold the Olympics vary. However, one thing is for sure, the funds allocated can reach billions or even tens of billions of dollars. For instance, the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang is estimated to cost $12.9 billion USD, and the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver cost $6.4 billion USD. Similarly, to host the 2012 Olympics and Paralympics, London allocated a budget of around $14.6 billion USD. To hold the 2008 Olympics, Beijing reportedly spent $42 billion USD.

Of course, these funds are not only spent on sports infrastructure, such as stadiums. As Investopedia noted, cities designated to host the Olympics will usually also work on developing other basic infrastructures by building new roads, or renovating airports, or building new hotels to accommodate the population surge during the Olympics.

During the 2016 Olympics, Rio reportedly built 15 thousand new hotel rooms to accommodate the potential tourists. Sochi spent $42.5 billion USD to build non-sporting infrastructure for the 2014 Olympics. Of the tens of billions of dollars Beijing spent on the 2008 Olympics, $22.5 billion USD was spent on renovating roads, airports, subways, and trains. They also spent $11.25 billion USD to clean up the city environment.

The improvement of infrastructure that the host government requires will, in turn, open up thousands of new job vacancies in the city. This is one of the advantages of taking up the opportunity in hosting the Olympics. Morever, the flock of sponsors, media, athletes, and spectators that visit the city will generate a lot of revenue for the local government.

Apart from tourists, the Olympics also have several other sources of income. One of them is the sale of licenses. Unfortunately, since the 2008 Olympics, Olympic license prices have continued to fall. You can see this in the graph below, obtained from Statista.

Olympic’s revenue from licensing. | Source: Statista

Marketing is another source of income for the Olympics. Unlike license prices, the Olympic income from marketing shows an upward trend for the past few years. Between 2013-2016, revenue from marketing did experience a minor decline from $8 billion USD in 2009-2012 to $7.8 billion USD in 2013-2016. But of course, this 3% drop is not very large by any standards.

 

Olympic’s revenue from marketing. | Source: Statista

Unfortunately, hosting the Olympics also poses its own problems. Despite the enormous costs incurred to organize the Olympics, host cities frequently find diminishing returns from the event. To hold the 2010 Winter Olympics, Vancouver spent a colossal $7.6 billion USD but only managed to rack up a profit of $2.8 billion USD. 

Sometimes, the Olympics don’t even provide that many new job opportunities in the city. For example, Salt Lake City (the host of the 2002 Olympics) reportedly only found 7 thousand new job openings, 10 times smaller than its initial estimations. Even worse, most of the job availability is usually aimed at individuals with existing jobs. Therefore, the argument that the Olympics can potentially solve the problems of unemployment is simply inaccurate.

More often than not, a large proportion of business opportunities that result from hosting the Olympics also benefit international companies instead of local enterprises. However, the biggest issue of hosting the Olympics is the abandonment of the infrastructure built for the event. When the Olympics come to a close, athletes villages and sports stadiums essentially serve no more purpose and are often left out to rot.

Athletes village in Turin. | Source: Olympics

Now that we have a clear picture of the requisites and budget of organizing the Olympics, let’s compare the required costs of holding esports events ranging from the national level to world-class tournaments such as TI or LOL Words

In terms of expenses, Vanzetti estimated that organizing world-class esports events would need a budget in the range of millions of dollars. Likewise, Herry estimates that the national-level esports tournament will cost around $500 thousand USD to US$1 million USD, while international-level tournaments would usually double that figure. He also predicts that holding The International or LOL Worlds would require a budget of $5-10 million USD. Irli also had a similar opinion with Herry, expecting that organizing TI or LOL Worlds will most likely have a minimum cost of $5 million USD.

“In terms of budget details, 50% is allocated to production, 20% to hospitality and manpower, 20% to promotions, and 10% for other miscellaneous works,” said Irli. “That’s usually the rough proportions, but it mostly depends on the client’s goals and needs. Some clients may want to focus more on increasing the production value, which means that more resources will be designated to production. Valve, for example, is always interested in creating stories and movie content based on the competition. I personally like to put more effort into producing lavish opening ceremonies, using state-of-the-art broadcasting technology, and so on.”

The content that Valve produces to support The International is True Sight. True Sight is a documentary series that showcases behind-the-scenes footage, stories, and experience of the Dota 2 pro players during TI or Majors. Unlike Valve, Riot Games prefers to present a grand opening ceremony. At LOL Worlds 2017, Riot flew a virtual dragon at the Beijing National Stadium. In 2018, Riot’s virtual K-Pop group, KDA, performed in front of the LOL World’s stage using augmented reality technology. Riot upped the performance yet again in 2019 by using cutting-edge holographic technology, which made the KDA members look highly realistic.

So, are esports tournaments profitable?

In 2018, Derrick Asiedu, Head of Global Events in Riot Games, revealed that Riot spends more than US$100 million per year on its esports program but is still miles away from making a return in capital. Fortunately, Riot’s effort in expanding its esports has allowed League of Legends’ esports ecosystem to thrive and attract millions of audience. Even though Riot might not have made a profit from esports for the moment, it successfully kept LOL relevant for more than 10 years. Consequently, Riot still can generate income through in-game content or sales to balance out their financial losses in esports. 

When compared to traditional sports competitions like the Olympics, esports also have a different model of monetization. 40% of traditional sporting events’ income usually come from sponsorships, 40% from broadcasting, and 20% from ticket and merchandise sales. As for esports, 80% of revenue comes from sponsorships, 15% from broadcasting, and 5% from ticket and merchandise sales, according to Alban Dechelotte, Head of Business Development and Sponsorship, League of Legends European Championship (LEC).

“We could go on only one platform and be exclusive,” Dechelotte told GamesIndustry, “We may have more revenue but we lose viewership which is important because at the end of the day, it’s a marketing tool for the game. So sponsorship becomes the number one priority for us, because compared to traditional sport, it’s double the weight in terms of revenue.”

In line with Asideu, Irli also estimated that sponsorships contribute to 80% of esports events’ income, and the rest of the 20% comes from ticket sales, merchandise, and so on. “These proportions are perhaps why most esports events today are held by the game developer/publisher themselves,” he said. “Esports sadly hasn’t been able to create revenue streams from ticket sales alone. It still primarily functions as a marketing tool for publishers with the sole purpose to create exposure for the game. Events such as The International and LOL Worlds can push revenue contributions of merchandise and ticket sales to around 30%-40%, but the rest still lies on the sponsors.”

BOOM Esports when they won the ESL Indonesia Championship Season 2. | Source: Twitter

Moreover, holding international esports tournaments can highly benefit local companies in the host city. Vanzetti mentioned that ESL does have its own private equipment and personnel to maintain the integrity of its events. However, ESL also frequently works with local suppliers for stage procurement, such as sounds, lights, and LEDs.

“For some parts of the event, we usually get help from local companies, such as for the procurement of furniture, security barriers, and cameras,” said Vanzetti. “Local companies can have the opportunity to earn big profits through hosting world-class esports competitions in their city or country.”

Conclusion

Preparation for holding the Olympics is much more complicated and takes much longer than holding esports events, even for prestigious tournaments like The International or LOL Worlds. Furthermore, in terms of cost, organizing the Olympics requires a much larger budget, up to billions of dollars, compared to the million-dollar range of esports tournaments. Even so, the Olympics never fails to attract millions of television viewers around the globe. Unfortunately, the number of Olympic spectators has experienced a continuous decline for the past few years, perhaps due to the changes in modern viewing habits. More people today, especially the younger generation, simply prefer watching online streams instead of TV.

In terms of income, both the Olympics and esports events can sometimes prove to be unprofitable. However, esports has always been used primarily as a marketing tool, not as an additional income stream. Game developers’ source of revenue still stems from selling games or in-game items. As for its purpose, esports has been incredibly effective in maintaining the longevity of many franchises such as League of Legends, Dota, or Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. Rainbow Six has also benefited from its esports ecosystem, as seen by its growing number of players for the past few years.

Featured Image: Unsplash. Translated by: Ananto Joyoadikusumo.

7 Infamous Myths Surrounding Gaming and Esports

There are definitely a lot of myths surrounding the gaming community and the activity as a whole, most of them being widely inaccurate and misleading. Unfortunately, many gamers often also fall victim to these assumptions, which is why I think it is important to air out and debunk all of these gaming or esports myths.

1. There Are Only a Few Female Gamers

One of the well-known myths surrounding the gaming community is that most females do not play video games. Indeed, the majority of the gamer population are males. The truth is, however, female gamers are not really that rare after all. According to data from Niko Partners, the number of female gamers in Asia in 2017 reached 346 million, comprising 32% of the total gamer population in the region. Two years later, in 2019, the population of female gamers rose to 500 million, which is now 38% of the gamer population in Asia. Another data from Statista shows that, in 2017, 46% of all gamers are women.

Even more surprisingly, Niko Partners have found that the growth of the female gamer population (14.8%) far exceeds the growth rate of gamers in general (7.8%). The approximate percentage of females in China’s gamer population is 45%. In Indonesia, this figure is marginally larger by 4%. However, the distribution of platforms where female gamers play is considerably skewed. Of the 500 million female gamers in Asia, 483 million (95%) mostly play on mobile, 201 million (40%) play on PC, and only 8.5 million (2%) play on consoles. 

As the number of female gamers increases, their contribution to the gaming industry’s income also rises. In 2019, female gamers contributed 35% to the total gaming industry revenue. This figure has increased to 39% in the next year. 

Proportion of gamers by age and gender. | Source: Statista

Recently, Sony also released a report which documents the details of its console sales. In the report, a significantly higher proportion of female gamers bought the Playstation 4 and 5 compared to the Playstation 1. During the PS1 era, only 18% of gamers who bought the console were females. However, during the PS4/5 era, this figure rose to an astounding 41%.

From the statistics above, we can clearly see that female gamers are not at all a rare species. Despite this fact, it can still be difficult to find and notice a female gamer in many of our games. According to recent research conducted by Reach3 Insights and Lenovo, 59% of female gamers hide their gender when playing online games. A report by GamesIndustry suggests that females do not show their gender to avoid the possibility of harassment. A respondent of the study even admitted that she goes so far as to only playing male characters in MMORPG games to maintain the anonymity of her gender. She explained that she does this to prevent receiving seductive, unwanted, and potentially sexually harassing messages. 

 

2. Gamers Are Anti-Social

Gamers are also often seen by the public as loners who spend most of their time playing games and not caring about the outside world. Contrary to most beliefs, however, the emergence of online games has encouraged gamers to socialize with each other. 

A 2016 study titled Motivations for Play in Online Games suggests three reasons why people play games. One of them is to establish relationships with other players. Given that humans are innately social creatures, it is not really surprising to see that we always try to connect with other people and be part of some like-minded group. Our natural attraction for socializing is the reason why online games — both cooperative and competitive games — are incredibly popular nowadays. In fact, in South Korea and China, playing games are considered a social activity. Before the unfortunate pandemic, Hybrid also held a gamers gathering event called Hybrid Dojo every two weeks. My friends and colleagues also frequently meet up to play PUBG Mobile together. Although some games can be enjoyed alone, most of us gamers do prefer playing games with other people.

In-game chat is one of the many forms of communication in gaming. | Source: Medium

Furthermore, a study in The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, released in 2014, found that a majority of online gamers deeply care about the dynamic relationships in gaming and not only focus on the sole gameplay aspect itself.

“Gamers aren’t the antisocial basement-dwellers we see in pop culture stereotypes; they’re highly social people,” said Nick Taylor, lead author of the study The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, as quoted from CNET. “This won’t be a surprise to the gaming community, but it’s worth telling everyone else. Loners are the outliers in gaming, not the norm.”

3. You Can Get Addicted and Become Mentally Ill from Playing Games

Today’s society does have the tendency to over glorify and, to a certain extent, romanticize mental illness, especially after the release of the movie The Joker. People in the younger generation frequently self-diagnose themselves with depression, ADHD, or Bipolar Disorder despite not having any expertise in the field of psychology. Unfortunately, this trend also spills over to gaming. 

Countless people claim that they or someone they knew is affected by gaming addiction. Furthermore, the World Health Organization (WHO) also officially recognized gaming disorder as a form of mental illness back in 2019. 

WHO officially declared gaming disorder as a mental illness in 2019. | Source: TechCrunch

WHO also elaborated the characteristics or telltale signs of someone with a gaming disorder. The first characteristic is losing control over gaming habits. In other words, someone who has a gaming disorder will find it difficult to stop playing and limit his/her playing time. The second sign of people affected by the disorder is overly prioritizing gaming over obligatory life activities such as eating, studying, or working.

Someone with a “gaming disorder” will also continue to keep playing despite being cognizant of the harmful effects that the activity has had on their life. For instance, the person will not stop playing games even though their grades have significantly declined. If a person has the three characteristics above, which also persist for 12 months, then the person is officially declared affected by gaming disorder

 

4. Games and Esports Are the Exact Same Thing

Esports is a part of gaming, a really big part, in fact. However, both of them are not the same thing. Some games don’t even have an esports scene. By definition, esports are competitions or tournaments that are based on video games. According to Red Bull, esports exists when the best players of a particular game compete for a prize. Therefore, the primary element of esports is competitiveness. But, of course, not all games are meant to be competitive. Some games highlight the narrative or the story, while other games focus on cooperative features.

Another thing that distinguishes esports from gaming is the player’s goals. In esports, the pros obviously have the sole objective to win every single tournament and title. However, normal players like most of us play games for far more varying reasons. Some of us might play to experience interesting gameplay. There are also those who play for the lore or immersive worldbuilding. Others might also play for the sake of socializing with friends or like-minded individuals. However, one thing is for sure: gaming has the primary purpose of being a medium of entertainment, not competition.

 

5. All Professional Esports Players Have Massive Salaries

The salaries of star players who play in the Premier League are certainly different from the salaries of players that compete in English Football League Two. This same salary disparity also occurs in the esports world. Although there has been an overall increase in esports pros’ salaries, many players are still affected by unequal pay. For one, player’s salaries are usually determined by their skill and capabilities. Esports scenes of different games also offer a widely diverse range of player salaries. Obviously, more popular games with a much more successful esports scene will usually offer more prestigious payments towards pros.

The minimum salary of an Overwatch League (OWL) player is around $50,000 USD per year. On the other hand, the average annual salary of a North American League of Legends (LCS) league player can reach $300 thousand USD. In Indonesia, the salary of Mobile Legends Professional League (MPL) players is only around IDR 7 million. As you can see, the pro salary of different games are incredibly diverse.

The minimum salary for an OWL player is US$50,000. | Source: Upcomer

OWL, LCS, and MPL are esports leagues with support from publishers. These publishers, therefore, determine the salary terms (such as minimum wage) of the pro players. However, not all game publishers support the esports scene of their games and explicitly define the payment terms of players. In this kind of situation, player salaries are even more uncertain. Let’s take the Valorant as an example. According to internal Hybrid.co.id sources, the range of salaries of Valorant players is relatively large. Some players receive salaries above the Jakarta Regional Minimum Wage (UMR), some have salaries around the Jakarta UMR, while other, less fortunate, players are paid below the minimum wage. Pros of unpopular games can even have salaries as low as only hundreds of thousands of rupiah.

6. Pro Players Spend All of Their Time Playing

Esports pros are comparable to conventional sports athletes. Both of them have the sole objective to improve themselves and hone their skills to be able to win. Therefore, most of us expect the esports pros to spend hours and hours every day practicing and playing. The truth is, however, esports pros don’t only use their time for playing games. They also need to engage in other activities such as reviewing VODs, strategies, and even physical exercise.

Liyu “Cody” Sun, a League of Legends player, mentions that adequate sleep, a healthy mindset, and a balanced social life are important aspects to maintain as an esports athlete. According to him, solely focusing on practice or playing is not an effective method to improve as a player.

“I do think that the most, or the best players in our industry are the ones that are able to find the best schedule for themselves, and, you know, be as efficient as they can with their lifestyle — practicing as well as exercising and eating well and having a decent social life,” Sun said in an interview from Intel.

According to Spectatorph, professional esports players usually spend about an hour of physical exercise every day. They will spend another hour on VOD reviews and up to 9 hours of practice, either alone or with the team.

Furthermore, the CEO of RRQ, Andrian Pauline also mentioned that the daily routine of pro players is not only playing or practicing. They also have to frequently review the team’s playstyle and even try to get insights into their opponent’s strategy. AP mentions that the proportion of non-gaming activities depends on the situation and needs of the team. “Sometimes the team may require the players to practice for the whole day. In other times, players can spend 20% or 50% of their time doing other activities,” he said when contacted by Hybrid. These proportions and schedules are often determined by the team coach.

 

7. Esports Fans Are Only Comprised of Males

The majority of esports viewers are, obviously, gamers. Unlike conventional sports, games in esports can be quite difficult to understand. And, of course, most of us will only enjoy esports content if we understand the game that is being broadcasted. Therefore, along with the increasing number of female gamers, it is not surprising to see that the female demography of esports viewers also increases.

According to data from Statista, around 22% of the esports audience around the world are females. The percentage of female esports viewers also differs from country to country. In the US, only 17% of esports fans are females. This figure is much larger in the UK (with 25%), China (with 30%), and South Korea (with 32%).

The percentage of female esports viewers in different countries. | Source: Statista

Data from Interpret shows that the number of female esports viewers in the fourth quarter of 2018 was 30.4%, Two years ago, however, this figure was only around 23.9%. Tia Christianson, Vice President of Interpret for Europe mentioned that this 6.5% increase was a significant milestone. She thinks that this is a step towards the right direction of gender equality in the esports community.

Conclusion

Humans have the tendency to fear new trends and also pretend to always be knowledgeable in many circumstances. As a result, our society has developed countless false assumptions, narratives, and harmful stigmas toward gaming and esports. For instance, in 1988-1992, many are concerned that that table-top RPG (TTRPG) games, such as Dungeons and Dragons, were promoting satanism, pornography, and even murder. Therefore, it is imperative that we always fact-check the ideas that we receive to get an accurate representation of the truth. I hope that this article has cleared up several popular gaming myths and helped you to be a more mindful individual.

Featured Image: South Park. Translated by: Ananto Joyoadikusumo.

Pros and Cons of the Absolute Power of Game Publishers in the World of Esports

In the esports world, game publishers are the absolute power holder who can determine every aspect of the game’s ecosystem. They are essentially the kings of the esports kingdom. Of course, there are pros and cons that comes with this system. On the one hand, publishers can give much-needed resources to grow and develop an esports ecosystem. On the other hand, publishers can also single-handedly shut down the whole esports ecosystem if deemed unprofitable. Let’s explore each these advantages and disadvantages in greater depth. 

Advantage #1: No Power Scramble

In Indonesia, four major associations oversee the country’s esports scene, namely the Indonesia Esports Association (IESPA), the Indonesian Video Game Association (Asosiasi Olahraga Video Games Indonesia or AVGI), the Indonesian Esports Federation (Federasi Esports Indonesia or FEI), and the Indonesian Esports Executive Board (Pengurus Besar Esports Indonesia or PBESI). Each association has its own affiliation. For example, IESPA has been a member of the International Esports Federation since 2013 and has been a member of the Indonesian Olympic Committee (Komite Olimpiade Indonesia or KOI) since 2018. In addition, it is also affiliated with the Indonesian Community Recreational Sports Federation (Federasi Olahraga Rekreasi Masyarakat Indonesia or FORMI). On the other hand, PBESI has a close relationship with the Indonesian National Sports Committee (Komite Nasional Olahraga Indonesia or KONI).

In August 2020, KONI recognized esports as a legitimate sport, no longer considered as merely a recreational sport. On the other hand, PBESI’s position is on par with the Football Association of Indonesia (PSSI) or the Badminton Association of Indonesia (PBSI). According to One Esports, however, PBESI is the association with the highest authority or power in promoting esports. All of this information suggests that IESPA’s power or influence in the esports realm is not very widespread. However, IESPA used to be involved in encouraging esports athletes to compete in global competitions and is even responsible for selecting esports athletes at the 2019 SEA Games.

We are proud to announce the Indonesian Esports national team contingent squad for the 2019 SEA Games. Further finalization processes will be carried out by the Indonesian Olympic Committee and @KEMENPORA_RI. Please support us so that Indonesia can win as much gold medals as possible! pic.twitter.com/OZ3apKDZgV

— Indonesia Esports Association (@iespaorg) September 2, 2019

Ideally, these esports associations in Indonesia can work hand in hand to develop the esports ecosystem in the country. Boxing, for example, has four associations that can coexist in overseeing and developing the sport. However, the coexistence of multiple associations does present the possibility of conflict and the overlapping of responsibilities.

Instead, if one single organization controls the whole sport, these power struggle conflict can be prevented entirely. Publishers can ensure that all parties involved in the esports ecosystem (players, teams, tournament organizers) will comply with the rules they set. As a result, the development of the esports ecosystem will become a much more cohesive and stable process.

Let’s compare the absolute power of publishers in the esports scene with a dictatorial government system. People have always said that a democratic system is far better than an autocratic one. However, in a democracy, the government leadership or power will always change once every few years. In Indonesia, for example, a person can serve as president for a maximum of ten years (or two terms). 

Unfortunately, different leaders will have different visions, goals, virtues, and implementation of policies. Erratic changes can occur especially if the new leader comes from the opposing party, which happened in DKI Jakarta a few years ago. When Anies Baswedan and Sandiaga Uno won the DKI Jakarta Regional Head Election in 2017, they immediately modified several policies that were put in place by the previous governors.

PBESI Inauguration. | Source: Hybrid.co.id

Of course, in the context of a country or state, a change in leadership may have a positive impact in the long term. However, in the esports scene, continuity is a very important commodity. For example, let’s say that the majority of the power in the esports scene was in the hands of association A. The association felt that the regeneration of esports players is of utmost importance and subsequently hosted several competitions at the high school and college level. However, the very next year, the power shifted to association B, which considers amateur-level tournaments unnecessary. Association B proceeds to disband all competitions at the student level held by association A in the previous year. You can see how changes of power or influence can cause instability and conflict in the esports ecosystem

On the flip side, countries under dictatorship solely depend on the goals and policies that the dictator implements. Similarly, when the publisher holds absolute power, the success or failure of the esports scene will depend entirely on the publisher’s actions. Fortunately, most game publishers do want their esports ecosystem to thrive since it highly impacts their finances and revenue.

Advantage #2: Publishers will try their best to maintain and cultivate their esports ecosystem

Valve earned approximately $130.8 million USD from the sales of The International 9 Battle Pass. 25% of the total Battle Pass sales — approximately US$32.7 million — went directly to TI9’s prize pool, enabling it to accumulate a whopping $34.3 million USD. Valve, interestingly, only prepared $1.6 million USD for the starting price and pocketed $98.1 million USD from the 75% of remaining sales of the Battle Pass. Dota 2 is a relatively old game, launched in July 2013, which is also free to play. However, due to the massive success of its esports scene, Dota 2 is arguably the most profitable money-making machine for Valve. Looking at Valve’s success from Dota 2, it begs the question: why do some game publishers not opt to maintain or grow their esports scene?

Of course, The International might be an extreme case that is not easily replicable for most publishers out there. However, publishers do have other options for monetizing the esports scene than just using the prize pool. For example, Riot Games creates special and limited skins based on the team that won the League of Legends World Championship. Riot also implemented the franchise league model to generate extra revenue from esports. A franchise league model allows teams to participate in the league if they pay a certain amount of money. Currently, Riot has implemented the model in three different LoL leagues, namely the North American League (LEC), European League (LEC), and South Korean League (LCK). In Indonesia, one of the publishers that adopt the franchise league monetization model is Moonton through Mobile Legends Professional League (MPL).

PBE previews, @DWGKIA for the win!

🏆DWG Nidalee
🏆DWG Kennen
🏆DWG Twisted Fate
🏆DWG Jhin
🏆DWG Leona pic.twitter.com/lk2YxQrWYI

— League of Legends (@LeagueOfLegends) April 13, 2021

Esports can also be used as a marketing tool to maintain the player base and extend the life span of a game. Ubisoft is an example of a successful publisher that uses esports as a means of marketing. In 2016, a year after launching Rainbow Six: Siege, the game only has around 10 million active players. Jumping to 2020, however, that number skyrocketed to 55 million players. This trend usually does not occur in the gaming industry, as games often lose players a few years after their release. However, Ubisoft uses R6’s esports scene to keep the game relevant and maintain the loyalty of its fans.

As we can observe, the esports scene can highly impact the success and relevancy of a game throughout its life span, which is why most game publishers will try their best to develop their esports ecosystem. For example, Dota 2 and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive were used to have a very big scene in Indonesia. However, since both of these franchises’ esports were not properly cultivated in the country, Dota 2 and CS eventually died out in the region. Very few esports organizations in Indonesia still have teams competing in these two games, and the player base in the country is also shrinking rapidly.

ClutchGuild that qualified for AOV World Cup 2018. | Source: Mineski

Similar to Dota 2 and CS, Arena of Valor is also losing its prestige in the local esports ecosystem. However, the AOV esports scene is still very much alive and much more thriving than the two previous games. AOV’s major tournament, Arena of Valor Premier League, is still being held today, with prize pools reaching $350 thousand USD. As you may have already expected, Tencent and Garena were directly involved in hosting these tournaments. Therefore, although some esports ecosystems can survive without publisher support (like what we see locally with Dota 2), the game publisher’s support will extensively affect the degree of success of an esports scene.

Advantage #3: Fixed Set of Rules

In most esports, both tournament organizers and game publishers usually determine the rules in their esport scenes. However, publishers do have a stronger influence to enforce the rules they set since they obviously have direct access to the game. For example, if an esports player cheats in an official PUBG Mobile competition, Tencent can directly ban the player ID from the game. On the other hand, if a player was caught cheating in a third-party tournament, then he/she might only be banned from participating in the tournament. 

We can also take an example from Pro Evolution Soccer, one of the large esports ecosystems in Indonesia without publisher support. The PES esports scene can grow due to the efforts of Liga1PES and also the Indonesia Football e-League (IFeL). Of course, these 2 leagues have implemented their own set of rules. However, Liga1PES will not be able to interfere in the regulations made by IFeL and vice versa, potentially causing several inconsistencies or interference. 

Head of Indonesia Football e-League, Putra Sutopo. | Source:  IFeL Official Documentation

Indeed, there is a possibility of abusing the absolute power that publishers have. However, referring back to the second point/advantage, publishers will most likely use their influence for the good of the esports ecosystems as it directly impacts their finances. 

Disadvantage #1: Abrupt Shutdowns of the Esports Ecosystem

Although esports can generate a lot of revenue for publishers, creating and maintaining a profitable esports ecosystem is not an easy task. More often than not, publishers have to invest a substantial amount of budget and time to develop the esports scene of their games. As a result, when esports is no longer deemed profitable for the company, it can decide to pull out their investments and shut down the ecosystem overnight. Blizzard Entertainment is an infamous publisher that has done this in the past.

In 2015, Blizzard released Heroes of the Storm as their MOBA franchise. In the same year, Blizzard collaborated with a university-level esports organization, Tespa, to hold a HoTS competition called Heroes of the Dorm. Blizzard provides a prize pool of $25,000 USD in scholarships for the winning team. One year later, in 2016, Blizzard held a top-tier HoTS competition for professionals called Heroes of the Storm Global Championship (HGC). It went all-in on the tournament, making it global, and invested a lot of capital into it. The HoTS esports scene was a massive hit, gathering a number of well-known esports organizations, such as Gen.G from South Korea and Fnatic from England.

Unfortunately, in December 2018, Blizzard decided to stop supporting the HoTS esports scene, considering it to be unprofitable. Blizzard did not inform this move far ahead of time, causing many HoTS professional coaches and players to abruptly lose their jobs. Esports organizations that recently created HoTS teams also suffer sizable losses. Luckily, many loyal HoTS fans continued to push and support the HoTS esports scene, although most tournaments are conducted at a much smaller scale.

Blizzard’s decision to unilaterally shut down HoTS’ esports is one of the negative impacts that may arise when publishers hold absolute power in the esports world. South Korean politicians even reacted to Blizzard’s action and subsequently made regulations to prevent this type of event. In May 2021, Korean Democratic Party congressman Dong-su Yoo proposed a regulation called the Heroes of the Storm Law which ensures that no tournament organizers or game publishers can abruptly cancel or shut down tournaments before properly informing related parties. According to a Naver Sports report, through the HoTS Law, Yoo hopes that game publishers will notify teams and players far ahead of time before executing an event cancellation.

“In esports, if the game publisher is no longer willing to support the competition, the rights of many other parties who are involved in the competitions, including esports organizations, players, casters, viewers, and others would seriously be affected by these kinds of unilateral decisions,” Yoo said, as quoted from The Esports Observer. He pointed out that most esports players are in their early 20s, a vital period of determining a person’s career. Instability or a sudden shut down of an esports ecosystem can have massive consequences. “Laws must be in place to protect them from unilateral damage,” he said.

Disadvantage #2: Publishers who have no interest in Esports

Nintendo, as an example, shows absolutely no interest in building an esports ecosystem out of Super Smash Bros. Contrary to our expections, however, the Super Smash Bros esports scene is actually quite developed. The game is included in EVO, a collection of the most prestigious fighting games competition, and an annual tournament called Smash Summit is also held since 2015. Despite the collective success that has been forged by the community, Nintendo still turns a blind eye towards Super Smash Bros’ esports scene.

Nintendo does provide some form of logistical support to the Smash community once in a while, but it rarely contribute to any sort of financial assistance. As a result, Super Smash Bros tournaments don’t have the large prize pools that we often see in other esports scenes. As a comparison, Smash Summit 5, which currently has the largest prize pool in all of Smash’s esports, only offered a prize of $83.7 thousand USD. On the other hand, MPL, which is only primarily broadcasted in Indonesia, has a prize pool of $150 thousand USD. Furthermore, Riot contributed $2.25 million USD for the League of Legends World Championship prize.

Nintendo’s philosophy towards Smash’s esports scene has generated a lot of backlash from professional Smash players. Eventually, in 2020, Nintendo’s President, Shuntaro Furukawa, was prompted to clarify the reasons behind Nintendo’s decision to not support the Super Smash Bros esports ecosystem. He explained that Nintendo wanted the game to be enjoyed by both casual and also hardcore players. Nintendo didn’t want to accentuate the differences in skills between the two groups. Indeed, most people do consider Super Smash Bros to be a much more casual fighting game played for fun and entertainment.

“Esports, in which players compete on stage for prize money as an audience watches, demonstrates one of the wonderful charms of video games,” Furukawa told Nikkei, as translated by Kotaku. “We are not necessarily opposing the idea of esports. However, we also want our games to be widely enjoyed by anyone regardless of experience, gender, or age. We want to be able to participate in a wide range of different events, instead of merely competing for prize money. Our strength, what differentiates us from other companies, is this different viewpoint.

Disadvantage #3: Declining Legitimacy of Third Party Tournaments

Let’s go back to Dota 2 for a moment. You probably have realized by now that The International is essentially the World Cup for Dota 2 players. Winning a TI is the pinnacle of all Dota 2 pros due to the sheer scale in prize pool money. 

For Valve, the massive hype for TI is definitely beneficial for the company. For third-party tournament organizers, however, not so much. Obviously, third-party tournaments are incredibly insignificant compared to TI. You can probably win all non-TI tournaments in a year and still can’t get close to TI’s winning prize or prestige. Thus, some teams or players might be discouraged to participate in these smaller-scale tournaments. Subsequently, the tournament organizers might have a more difficult time getting views from audiences.

Furthermore, small-scale tournaments created by third-party organizers usually find it difficult to compete with official tournaments from publishers in terms of prestige. When you watch The International or PUBG Mobile Global Championship, you know that the teams competing in those tournaments are some of the best teams in the world. The teams in these high-tier tournaments need to go through a “preliminary round” at the national or regional level, filtering all the less competent teams. You can also observe which teams can compete at the national, regional, and global levels.

Astralis and Team Liquid, winners of Intel Grand Slam Season 1 and 2. | Source: Dexerto

Of course, not all third-party TOs are willing to spend substantial investments to create this “filtration” process or a tiered esports competition. One exception is Intel, a non-publisher company that held the Intel Grand Slam with help from ESL Gaming. Intel Grand Slam offers a $1 million USD prize for a CS:GO team that wins 4 S-Tier tournaments in a window of 10 consecutive esport events.

The existence of the Intel Grand Slam does prove, to a certain extent, that third-party organizations can create high-tier and competitive tournaments. But, of course, not many companies are willing to invest as much as Intel. Intel has an adequate budget and is also considered an endemic brand in esports. As an illustration, in 2020, Intel’s revenue reached $ 77.87 billion USD. On the other hand, NVIDIA’s revenue in the 2021 fiscal year was only $16.68 billion USD, while Sony’s is $10.7 billion USD, and Lenovo Group only accumulated $50.7 billion USD.

Conclusion

There is a saying that goes: Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. A person or entity who has complete control is very likely to make selfish decisions that will benefit themself. In the world of esports, publishers –  who always have absolute control – also have the potential to act arbitrarily, evident from Blizzard’s decision to unilaterally shutting down the Heroes of the Storm esports ecosystem.

Of course, not all companies will follow in Blizzard’s footsteps. Most publishers out there do consider esports as a marketing tool to attract new audiences, maintain the loyalty of fans, and subsequently generate revenue. However, establishing a healthy esports ecosystem is can be difficult, and will need the collective support of professional teams, players, and tournament organizers. Therefore, while publishers have all the power to make all the decisions, they must also take the necessary steps to benefit all parties if they were to create a profitable esports scene. 

Translated by: Ananto Joyoadikusumo.

Niko Partners: The Growing Esports Viewership in Southeast Asia

The gaming industry in the Greater Southeast Asia region — including Southeast Asia and Taiwan — is estimated to be worth$8.3 billion USD by 2023. One of the primary driving factors behind the growth of the gaming industry at GSEA is esports. This is not a surprise considering that most gamers in Asia are also esports enthusiasts. According to data from Niko Partners, around 95% of PC gamers and 90% of mobile players in Asia are, to a certain extent, active or interested in the esports world. In a previous article, we already discussed the state of the gaming industry at GSEA in 2020. This time, we will dive deeper into the esports world in Asia, especially SEA.

The Esports Audience in Southeast Asia

According to Niko Partners’ data, the number of esports viewers in East Asia and Southeast Asia reaches 510 million people. Furthermore, around 350 million of these esports fans came from China, and the remaining 160 million are from Southeast Asia, Japan, and South Korea.

“There are approximately 100 million esports viewers throughout Southeast Asia. The number of viewers and players in each specific country, more or less, is directly proportional to the population size and internet quality in the country,” said Darang S. Candra, Director of Asia’s Gaming Market Research Company, Niko Partners. “In SEA, Indonesia has the largest number of viewers and esports players, followed by the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore.” If you want more details regarding the statistics of the esports audience in SEA, you can refer to Niko Partner’s premium report.

The population size and internet speeds in Southeast Asian Countries.

The five countries in Southeast Asia with the largest population are Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, and Myanmar. In terms of internet speed, Singapore comes on top not only in the SEA region but also throughout the world. According to data from Speedtest, the average speed of a fixed broadband network in Singapore reaches 245.5 Mbps. As you can see in the table above, although Indonesia has the largest population, the country’s internet quality is relatively subpar when compared to the other countries in Southeast Asia.

The Philippines, by far, is the country in SEA that has racked up the most top-tier esports achievements. For instance, the Philippines managed to bring home the most medals (3 gold, 1 silver, 1 bronze medal) from the esports section at the 2019 SEA Games. As a comparison, Indonesia’s esports team only managed to win two silver medals.

The Philippines won three gold medals in three different games: Dota 2, StarCraft II, and Mobile Legends: Bang Bang. Last January, Bren Esports, a Filipino team, also won the M2 World Championship. The StarCraft II player who won the gold medal for the Philippines was Caviar “EnDerr” Acampado, a pro StarCraft II player since 2011. EnDerr is still active in the StarCraft II esports scene until this very day. In 2021, he has even won two minor tournaments called PSISTORM StarCraft League – Season 1 and Season 2. Last 2020, he also won a major Starcraft II tournament, DH SC2 Masters 2020 Winter: Oceania / Rest of Asia.

The Philippines also houses many talented Dota 2 players and teams. In addition to successfully bringing home a gold medal at the 2019 SEA Games, the Philippines also has a formidable Dota 2 team called TNC Predator. Not long ago, TNC won the Asia Pacific Predator League 2020/21 – APAC. In 2020, they also placed first in both the BTS Pro Series Season 4: Southeast Asia and ESL One Thailand 2020: Asia. Furthermore, they also won the MDL Chengdu Major and ESL One Hamburg in 2019. TNC is also one of the few SEA teams that consistently made it into The International, qualifying for four consecutive years from 2016 to 2019.

TNC Predator is regarded by many to be the best Dota 2 team in SEA. | Source: IGN

Another member of the Philippines’ esports arsenal is Alexandre “AK” Laverez. He is a professional Filipino Tekken player who brought home the silver medal at the 2019 SEA Games. AK is incredibly well-known in the global Tekken esports scene since 2013. At that time, he managed to place third in the Tekken Tag Tournament 2 Global Championship despite being only 13 years old. In addition, he also won the runner-up position at the WEGL Super Fight Invitational and EVO Japan 2019.

However, Indonesian esports teams also do have their own set of accomplishments. When compared to most esports organizations in other Southeast Asian countries, the Indonesian esports team is incredibly popular. In fact, the three most popular esports teams in Southeast Asia (EVOS Esports, Aura Esports, and RRQ) are all based in Indonesia.

Esports Tournament Ecosystem in Southeast Asia

The number of esports players and viewers in a region can only grow if its ecosystem is healthy and thriving. Fortunately, the esports industry in Southeast Asia has a lot of potential. Lisa Cosmas Hanson, President of Niko Partners, even said that it is incredibly likely that SEA will become a global esports center in the future. To test this prediction, we can take a look at the number of esports tournaments held in the region.

“In 2020, there were over 350 major tournaments held in the Southeast Asian region. This figure does not even include amateur or small-scale tournaments,” said Darang.

Phoenix Force from Thailand won FFWS 2021. | Source: The Strait Times

The esports tournament prize pools in SEA are also quite large. Free Fire World Series (FFWS) 2021 is, by far, the esports tournament with the largest total prize pool in the region, reaching $2 million USD. Furthermore, this tournament broke the record for the largest viewing numbers in all of esports. During its peak, FFWS 2021 managed to accumulate viewership numbers of 5.4 million people. In comparison, the 2019 League of Legends World Championship — the previous title holder of the largest audience in an esports tournament — only had a peak of 3.9 million viewers.

Besides FFWS 2021, another esports tournament that offers a massive prize pool is the ONE Esports Singapore Major, which has a hefty $1 million USD prize pool. In 2018, another Dota 2 tournament held in SEA, the Dota 2 Kuala Lumpur Major, also had a $1 million USD prize pool.

Currently, many esports leagues in Southeast Asia implement the franchise model, which is predicted to be the trend in the future. An example of these leagues is Mobile Legends Professional League Indonesia (MPL ID). There is also a rumor that MPL Philippines will be adopting the franchise model in Season 8. The Free Fire Master League has also used a league system similar to the franchise system. Each team is required to pay a certain amount of money if they wish to participate in the FFML. Esports organizations also have the choice to include more than one team to participate in the league. This contract between esports teams and the tournament organizers usually only lasts for the duration of one season.

Featured Image: Freepik. Translated by: Ananto Joyoadikusumo

The Esports Industry’s Polemic Against Certification

Talk is cheap. Everyone can claim that they are proficient at a certain skill or field. However, proving your competency is a whole other matter. Since the dawn of the education system, schools and universities have used scores or GPAs to measure the capabilities of students. For working professionals, certificates can be one way to validate one’s expertise. What about in the world of esports? Is there currently any form of certification system in the esports industry?

Esports Certification Institute’s Plan to Create a Certification Program

The Esports Certification Institute announced their plan to hold a certification exam in the field of esports at the end of April 2021. The goal of behind this plan is to push the culture of meritocracy and foster professionalism in esports players. Additionally, they also hope that the existence of this certification program will make the world of esports more inclusive.

How do you get a certification from ECI? Well, of course, you just need to take their exam. The test from ECI covers three main criteria: esports knowledge, problem-solving abilities, and statistics. In addition to being given a certificate, people who passed the exam will also be included in the ECI membership program, which provides the opportunity to network and discuss with ECI advisors.

ECI was founded by Sebastian Park, former Esports VP of the Houston Rockets NBA team, and Ryan Friedman, former Chief of Staff of Dignitas, an American esports organization. ECI’s advisory board members consist of executives from various companies involved in esports, from venture capital firms such as BITKRAFT, legal firms like ESG Law, to esports organizations such as Cloud 9 and Gen.G.

ECI wants to create a certification program for esports

“One of the biggest problems that exist in the esports industry is that employers have no way of validating the skills of job applicants,” Park said, according to Yahoo. “Most esports organization wants to hire someone based on their skills and abilities, but it can be very difficult to do so.”

Of course, the exams from ECI are not free. You have to pay $400 USD to be able to take the exam. The ECI that they have conducted their market research before determining this entrance fee. They claimed that their exam fee is relatively cheaper when compared to certification exams in other fields. For example, the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) certification costs $1000 USD. For the underprivileged, ECI has also collaborated with various educational institutions to create a free exam program.

The reason ECI created a certified exam in the world of esports is to solve the problem of finding qualified personnel in the field. Even Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick is willing to donate US$4 million to the University of Michigan to open an esports major. However, ECI’s vision to create a certified test has actually drawn a lot of protests from parties in the esports industry, which caused ECI to postpone its plan of establishing the certification program.

Unfortunately, in Indonesia, there are currently not many programs that offer these sorts of certification. One of the only popular ones in the country is perhaps RRQ Academy. People who want to practice their gaming skills and potentially go pro in the future can join RRQ’s program. Currently, RRQ Academy offers training for four games: Mobile Legends, PUBG Mobile, LoL: Wild Rift, and Free Fire. After attending classes for two days, participants will get the certificate. Unfortunately, RRQ Academy explained that the certificate that the academy participants received does not include the assessment of their abilities. However, the certification does not have an expiration date.

Now, let us discuss the pros and cons of establishing certified exams in the world of esports.

 

Advantages of Having a Certification Program in Esports

Certificates can be proof of someone’s competency in a field. For example, anyone can create a Facebook account but not everyone has a Facebook Blueprint certificate. This certificate is only given to people who really understand how to use various digital marketing products provided by Facebook and its subsidiaries.

In addition to enhancing credibility, another advantage of having a certification program is that it extends knowledge and skills, according to the International Society of Automation. Furthermore, taking a certified exam will also enhance one’s reputation as a professional and prepares them to climb the career ladder. Certification will also allow companies to find employee that matches their needs. 

Gary Ongko, CEO of BOOM Esports frequently compares the esports industry to the Wild West. “Many workers in esports industry are esports enthusiasts, but most of them do not have any form of certification,” he said when contacted by Hybrid.co.id. “Because there is no legitimate esports major, maybe this certificate can help us hire people who want to work/enter esports.”

Meanwhile, according to the Head of Operations, Mineski Indonesia, Herry Wijaya, the emergence of a certification system in esports is proof that more and more people are getting interested in working in the esports field. Hopefully, as more people get involved in the industry, there will also be a larger talent pool available to benefit esports. 

The requirements for getting a job in the esports industry have continuously increased over the years. As mentioned previously, universities have even started to open esports majors. However, the industry will still have to ultimately wait a few more years before being able to hire people with esports majors.

Certification programs can also filter people who are truly committed and passionate about their career. Obviously, getting a certificate will require an extensive investment in money and personal effort. Getting a certificate at RRQ Academy, for example, requires you to play Rp. 199 thousand and spend 2×6 hours in online classes.

Lastly, certification allows for the appreciation of skills. For example, a person with a Facebook Blueprint certificate will be recognized as someone with the capability of maintaining an important Facebook Page. 

Disadvantages of Emerging Certification Programs in Esports

As mentioned previously, one of the main functions of a certification program is to validate the competency and credibility of someone’s skill sets. However, the scope of work in the world of esports is incredibly broad. The qualifications required to become a team coach is obviously very different from a videographer. The esports industry is also still relatively young and there are no “best practices” like in other, more mature industries. The most obvious example of these differing standards is the way people write the word “esports”. While some may simply write esports, others may use e-sports or even eSports.

Indeed, certification programs can help companies find competent employees that suits their needs. However, making certificates an absolute requirement to work in an esports company can cause major problems. According to Tobiaz M. Scholz from The Esports Observer, the existence of a certified exam can hinder a lot of people from entering the world of esports because not everyone will have the chance to take them.

ECI previously also revealed that one of its goals for making certified exams is to make the esports industry more inclusive. However, studies show that the existence of standardized tests can potentially deepen the chasm of racism or socioeconomic differences. Of course, not everyone in the world has access to the same level of education. In Indonesia, for example, high school students living in urban, more prosperous areas will have a better chance of getting high National Examination scores than students living in underdeveloped regions.

On the other hand, it is important to note that just because many people in the esports industry are against the existence of a certification program doesn’t mean that the world of esports doesn’t need credible professionals. It is quite the opposite, actually. The Head of Operations in Mineski Indonesia, Herry Wijaya, said that the esports industry is in desperate need of people who are highly skilled in the respective fields. Furthermore, he also felt that the skill sets applied in the esports world can be learned from other industries as well. He took broadcasting as an example.

Today, esports is able to attract many sponsorships due to its massive growth and young viewership demography. Esports, for the longest time, have been able to gather large audiences by making interesting broadcasts. Of course, creating an engaging show will require the collective work of skilled and experienced individuals who understand fundamental broadcasting techniques. To meet this need, many esports broadcasts frequently hired employees who had previously worked at TV stations.

“We already have a business plan, we already know what kind of people we need, so we just have to look for someone professional and experienced. For example, if we need someone to manage our events, we will hire someone who understands event and cost management, which are skills taught in economic studies,” Herry said. “This is essentially the hiring and workflow process in today’s esports industry 2.0.”

The CEO of RRQ, Andrian Pauline alias AP, also echoed Herry’s comments. He mentioned that the disciplines used in the esports industry – such as videographers, referees, or social media specialists – already exist in other industries. Those jobs are not something available only in the world of esports.

Esports teams and conventional sports teams have the same order. | Source: Hotspawn

“There are a lot of similarities between the esports industry and the conventional sports industry. There are coaches, managers, analysts, players, and sponsors,” said AP. “There are people who manage the team’s training schedule, scout for new upcoming players, and run the academies to nurture young talents.”

Furthermore, the AP said, “The most distinct difference between the two industries is the product. Football has been around for more than 100 years, while esports is still very young because it is based on video games. Although games always evolve from time to time, the whole framework stays the same. The skills that are required in the field don’t change. Therefore, if there were to be some sort of certification of esports, it would be more geared towards the general understanding or knowledge of the esports world.”

Herry then compared the current esports industry with the esports industry in the early 2010s, which he labeled as the era of esports 1.0. During this era, people who work and get involved in esports are only passionate about the scene. However, they do not necessarily have expertise in the profession they are engaged in. As a result, they will need to learn these mandatory skills by themselves. Let us take Eddy Lim, President of IeSPA and founder of Ligagame, as a case study.

“Mr. Eddy does not have a broadcasting background, but Ligagame works in the broadcast sector. So, he learned the necessary knowledge and skills to fit in,” said Herry. However, nowadays, most esports companies usually look for people who are already proficient or experienced, which is why tournament organizers frequently hire employees who worked in the TV sector in the past.

 

Alternatives to Certification

Even though the esports industry currently does not have any form of established certification systems, there are other ways the esports organizations can use to find competent professionals. Many of them have used scouting methods in the past to find talented young players. Tournament organizers like Mineski also have their own practices to screen their employees.

“We usually examine the applicant’s portfolio and work history first,” said Herry. “After we identify their skills and abilities, we begin the testing process. During the interview, we also try to confirm their competency in their field. For example, if an applicant claims to be skilled in handling esports events, we will test him/her about the basic knowledge of handling events and how to efficiently organize them.

Fathimah Prajna Iswari, People Team Lead, Garena Indonesia, also said that certification was not the main criterion when it comes to recruiting new employees. Of course, having a certificate is always a plus. However, Garena will mostly use screen candidates in the early stage by observing their performance in formal education.

“The more important qualities that recruiters notice when selecting candidates is their problem-solving skills, motivation to complete a set of tasks, the curiosity of and willingness to learn new subjects, teamwork aspects, and so on.” Fathimah mentioned.

Broadcasting is an important part of the world of esports. | Source: Twitter

Generally speaking, there are three stages in the recruitment process at Garena. First, they will review all incoming applications and screen which candidates will enter the next stage. As mentioned previously, formal education will be the main focus of the Garena team in this recruitment phase. Qualified candidates will then be invited to participate in an interview with the hiring manager in the second stage. Candidates who passed this stage will proceed to the final interview with Garena Indonesia Country Head.

“Particularly for esports, Garena is looking for people who have good project management and communication skills while also prioritizing teamwork,” said Fatimah. “Candidates with relevant experiences, such as internships in broadcasting events, will have a significantly higher chance to get hired.”

 

Conclusion

Passion is no longer enough if you want to work in esports. Today, people who want to enter the esports industry must have the necessary skills that organizations seek. Fortunately, most knowledge and proficiency from other industries can be translated into the esports sector. Before working at Hybrid.co.id, I was mostly involved with technology. However, after switching professions to an esports journalist, I can use the writing and journalism skills I learned at my previous job.

The popularity and immense growth of esports have attracted more and more people to work in the industry, especially because it is one of the few jobs that can survive the COVID-19 pandemic. However, newer and inexperienced people have a lot of to catch up before they can be qualified to work in esports. Certified training and tests can be a simple way to learn basic esports knowledge and solve this problem.

While certificates can aid workers in proving their competency and help companies in finding the employees with the right skillset, ownership of a certificate cannot be an absolute requirement for esports-related jobs. After all, the esports sector is incredibly dynamic, and a wide range of expertise is required throughout the industry.

In the end, we cannot really blame the agencies who want to create certification programs for esports since it can be used to filter people who are passionate about pursuing a career in the sector. However, if not executed properly, these certifications might cause their own fair share of problems.

Translated by: Ananto Joyoadikusumo

A Deep Dive Into the Viewership Statistics of MPL Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia, and Singapore

Moonton organizes the national league of Mobile Legends: Bang Bang in four countries, namely Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Singapore. MPL Indonesia and Singapore ended in early May, while Philippines’ and Malaysia’s MPL finished on Sunday, May 30, 2021. With all the MPLs coming to their conclusion, we can compare the four Mobile Legends national leagues and measure their popularities. We will be using data from Esports Charts as our primary benchmark.

MPL League Viewers 

Of the four national leagues of Mobile Legends, MPL ID and MPL PH generally accumulates the most spectators. At its peak, the viewership numbers of both these leagues can go over 1 million. More precisely, the peak viewers of MPL ID reached 1.8 million while MPL PH reached 1.4 million. Furthermore, the total watch hours for both leagues also amount to tens of millions of hours: MPL ID has 54.5 million watch hours, and MPL PH has 33.1 million watch hours. In terms of the average number of viewers, MPL ID and MPL PH has around 321 thousand and 201.7 thousand viewers, respectively.

Peak viewers of MPL in 4 countries. | Source: Esports Charts

Moving on to Malaysia, MPL MY reached approximately 3.8 million watch hours with an average of 20.7 thousand viewers. At its peak, MPL MY’s viewership number did reach 111.2 thousand. On the other hand, MPL SG underwhelmingly accumulated 213.4 thousand watch hours, 2.6 thousand average viewers, and 22.7 thousand peak viewership numbers. However, 2021 is, after all, the first season of MPL SG. Before 2021, the Malaysian and Singapore MPLs were integrated into one league.

Total watch hours of MPL in 4 countries. | Source: Esports Charts

There are several obvious reasons why MPL ID and MPL PH have far more viewers compared to MPL MY or SG. The first factor that comes into play is the larger population of both countries. According to data from Worldometer, Indonesia’s and the Philippines’ population in 2020 will reach over 273 million and 109 million, respectively. In comparison, Malaysia has a total population of 32 million people, while Singapore’s population is only a mere 5.8 million people.

Therefore, comparing raw watch hours and viewership numbers will not paint the correct picture regarding the popularity of each MPL league. Fortunately, Moonton also broadcast MPL in English (other than the usual first language of each country). In an attempt to find the proper benchmark to measure the popularity of each country’s MPL, we can compare the statistics based on English MPL broadcasts.

The MPL English Broadcast Audience

With data from Esports Charts, we compared the number of viewers from MPL ID, MPL PH, MPL MY, and MPL SG English broadcasts. Even though MPL ID, by far, has the highest number of spectators, there are only an average of 28.5 thousand viewers on its English broadcast.

The same trend occurs in both MPL MY, where the viewership numbers differ drastically from 111 thousand to only 10.2 thousand. Although MPL PH also has a decrease in spectators on English broadcasts, it still has a relatively large audience of 146.8 thousand. On the other hand, the number of peak viewers from MPL SG did not change, accumulating 22.7 thousand spectators.

Peak viewers of MPL English broadcasts in 4 countries. | Source: Esports Charts

In Indonesia, the matchup between EVOS Legends and Bigetron Alpha in the final round was the match that attracted the most spectators. At its peak, the match gathered as many as 1.84 million viewers, 1.81 million of those viewers were from the Indonesian broadcast. The English broadcast, unfortunately, only merely surpassed a peak of 28.5 thousand spectators. 

The trend in MPL MY and MPL PH is somewhat different from MPL ID. In Indonesia, the final round is usually considered the “main event” where it will attract the most audience. This notion applies to both the Indonesian and English broadcast of MPL ID. However, in MPL MY and MPL PH, the popular matches in the English broadcast differ from the popular matches broadcasted in their native language.

Most popular matches in MPL PH in general (above) and on English broadcasts (below). | Source: Esports Charts

So far, the most popular match from MPL PH is the final round match between XctN against Blacklist International, which managed to get an audience of up to 1.4 million people. In the English broadcast of MPL PH, however, NXP.SOLID versus Laus Playbook Esports (LPE) on Week 1, Day 2 was the most viewed match (attracting peak viewership numbers of over 146.8 thousand).

The same thing occurs in MPL MY. The most popular match in the Malay broadcast was between TODAK and RSG on Day 3 of the Playoffs. On the other hand, the most-watched match in the English broadcast was between Still Moving Under Gunfire (SMG) team against the Geek Family on Day 1 of the Playoffs. The two matchups gathered an audience of around 112.2 thousand and 10.2 thousand people, respectively.

Most popular matches from MPL MY in general (above) and on English broadcasts (below). | Source: Esports Charts

With regards to the view count on each platform, YouTube still accounts for the most of the views, followed by NimoTV, and finally, Facebook. As an illustration, the final match between EVOS Legends and BigetronA has around 999 thousand peak viewers on YouTube, while NimoTV only had about 854 thousand peak viewers and Facebook merely reached 146 thousand viewers.

In Indonesia, Moonton broadcasts MPL on the three platforms mentioned above. In the Philippines, apart from these three platforms, MPL PH also broadcasts through TikTok. Both Malaysia and Singapore broadcast MPL on Youtube and TikTok, with the exception that Malaysia also uses the Facebook platform.

Peak viewers of MPL on different platforms. | Source: Esports Charts

The graph above illustrates the contribution of each platform in terms of viewership numbers. In Indonesia, the two most widely used platforms are YouTube and NimoTV. Facebook, interestingly, contributes most of the views in MPL PH, followed by YouTube. In Malaysia, the popularity of YouTube and Facebook almost has the same popularity, accumulating around 60 thousand views. Lastly, YouTube seems to be the most preferred platform to watch MPL by Singaporean fans.

Disclosure: Hybrid is a media partner of Esports Charts. This article is translated by: Ananto Joyoadikusumo

The Correlation Between Free-to-Play Games and Thriving Esports Scenes

League of Legends, Dota 2, Mobile Legends, and Free Fire are some examples of games with massively successful esports scenes. Uncoincidentally, they are also free-to-play games. Of course, this trend begs the question: why are most games with big esports ecosystems use the free-to-play model?

Esports is a clever method to generate long-term income, which does not apply in the Pay-to-Win method. Apart from the long-term business model, which we will discuss in more detail later, there are several factors that allow esports to grow rapidly in free-to-play games.

The Different Types of Video Game Monetization Models

Before discussing the correlation between free-to-play games and thriving esports scenes, let’s take a look at the various monetization models in the game industry today. Free-to-play is just one of several monetization systems used by game developers. Other models that are commonly adapted today are the pay model and subscription model.

In the pay model (sometimes referred to as single payment), players are required to pay a certain amount of money to be able to play a game. In other words, you pay for the game upfront, and the game is yours forever to play. The younger generation or today’s mobile gamers who are used to the free-to-play games may feel unfamiliar with this system. However, the pay model is actually the most common and oldest monetization methods in the gaming industry. Most AAA game developers (like Cyberpunk 2077 or GTA V, for example) and indie developers (like Stardew Valley) do use the pay model extensively.

Source: Rockstar Games

Games using the pay model are usually not too focused on esports. Of course, there are exceptions to this trend, such as most of fighting games (Street Fighter Series, Tekken Series, and so on) or sports games (FIFA, PES, NBA 2K series, and so on). Counter-Strike: Global Offensive also initially used the pay model but then was made free-to-play in 2018.

In the subscription model, players have to pay a certain amount of money every month to play the game. This model is rarely used in Indonesia and is more commonly known by western gamers. MMORPG games, like World of Warcraft or Final Fantasy XIV Online, often use the subscription model.

The subscription fees of World of Warcraft. Source: Blizzard Official Site

World of Warcraft actually integrates different monetization models at once. For example, players must first pay a certain amount of money to get access to the latest expansion, then pay again every month to continue playing. The expansion access fees are usually more expensive (around IDR 500 thousand, similar to the price of AAA games), while the monthly subscription price is much cheaper (around IDR 150 thousand per month)

The subscription model may feel similar to the Battle Passes (like the Royale Pass on PUBG Mobile or Starlight Member on Mobile Legends) in free-to-play games. However, the key difference between the two is that Battle Passes don’t restrict you from playing the game if you don’t pay the monthly fee. On the other hand, in World of Warcraft, free-to-play players can only level up characters to level 20. Subscriptions will allow players to level up to level 50, and purchasing expansions will increase the limit to level 60.

As the subscription model continues to develop, payment of fees is no longer limited to real money. In World of Warcraft, for example, you can pay the subscription fee using the “gold” you get in-game (through crafting, hunting, or trading). Of course, players will need to collect a ton of gold to be able to pay the subscription fees on a consistent basis. Therefore, players have to either sacrifice their time in-game or real-world finances to play the game.

The most modern monetization system in the gaming industry is free-to-play. As the name suggests, players don’t have to spend any money to play the game. However, if the game is free, how can the developers generate revenue to sustain the game? Well, most free-to-play games nowadays implement various types of micro-transactions.

Weapon skins are an example of a micro-transaction used by the free-to-play game, VALORANT. Source: VALORANT In-Game Store

Micro-transactions provide the option for players to purchase cosmetics with real money. In some games, micro-transaction items are usually just add-ons and do not provide any unfair advantage to the gameplay. Examples of these items are character skins in MOBA games or weapon skins in FPS games. However, some in-game micro-transactions will allow the player to get stronger or reach higher levels faster. Purchasing the double XP item in RPG games is one example. Free-to-play games that include the option to afford items with unfair advantages are called Pay-to-Win.

The micro-transaction is not only used by free-to-play games. World of Warcraft and Street Fighter V also such in-game purchases to complement their gameplay experience. 

In addition to the micro-transaction method, free-to-play games are now starting to explore new monetization methods to add to their source of income, one of them being esports.

 

Why Are Successful Esports Games Mostly Free-to-Play?

“If you don’t pay for a product, you are the product.”

A slightly different version of this quote was mentioned when the television was first booming in the public. Today, this expression became widely used, especially in the era of over-attachments to social media such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. So, what does esports have to do with this particular quote?

As you may have already guessed, most game publishers and developers in the esports world are trying to turn average players into esports enthusiasts. The esports audience will then be used as a “product” that can be sold to investors or sponsors. This statement may sound somewhat cynical on the surface. However, from the player’s perspective, we actually do not have to experience the “exploitative” nature of other monetization methods. 

If you have read Ellavie’s article that discusses the different game industries of Japan, China, and South Korea, you may remember that the free-to-play model is actually a fairly old concept in the gaming industry. Nexon, a South Korean game publisher and developer, was the first to release a free-to-play game called QuizQuiz in 1999.

However, before today’s esports boom, monetizing free-to-play games can hinder the player’s in-game experience and, sometimes, make it severely irritating.

If you’ve been a gamer since the age of internet cafes, you might remember the infamous RF Online. If you play RF Online, you will eventually come across the Premium Service: a service you can activate by buying a voucher (with real money). Premium Service will give you the convenience of greater XP gains and more loot monsters.

RF Online, an RPG game that was popular in its time

Back then, this was one of the most common forms of monetization for free-to-play games. Indeed, RF Online can be played without needing to spend a single penny. However, your XP gain will be extremely slow, and getting good equipment is extremely difficult because your loot quality is underwhelming. Furthermore, the main attraction of RF online is its PVP element, which requires you to accumulate the highest possible level and obtain the best equipment to be able to compete with other players

Can players have super strong characters without Premium Service? Yes. However, you will need to spend more time and effort grinding the game rather than someone who simply used the Premium Service. These types of monetization systems place more priority on paid players and somewhat neglects free players, which is why I refer to them as being “exploitative”.

There is some debate about the fairness and ethics behind these systems. Fair or unfair, ethical or unethical, it is up to you to decide. In the end, RF Online is, surprisingly, still alive until this very day. Players who are still loyal to the game continue to buy the Premium Service and do not seem to have any problem with the monetization model. Back when I was in junior high school, I also played RF Online and even bought the Premium Service.

However, we can all agree that this system of income is incredibly limiting and somewhat risky for the game developers. What happens if all of the players suddenly stop buying the Premium Service?. Even worse, what if everyone stopped playing the game because they felt exploited by the Premium Service system?

Another system that is similar to RF Online’s Premium Service is the “speed up” feature in Clash of Clans (CoC). Although the two systems may look different, they inherently have the same principle: speed up the progression (character strength/troop creation/level up) for players who have in-game purchases.

During the height of its popularity, CoC had amassed tremendous income with this monetization model. According to statista, Clash of Clans had earned an income of $ 1.8 trillion USD in 2015. Unfortunately for Supercell, this figure continues to decline every year, reaching a low of $ 722 million USD in 2019.

The data is an illustration – if not evidence – of how this monetization system is not a sustainable income strategy. As I mentioned before, the system heavily depends on the player’s desire to speed up progress and buy micro-transactions. Once the game’s hype dies down, players will eventually stop playing, and the income source consequently disappears. We also briefly discussed the “pay-to-win” issue in free-to-play games if you want to know more about why monetization in this approach has its own problems. 

Developers have used many ways of incentivizing players to keep staying in the system. They might use “subtle” methods, as seen in the Vox video below. If this method fails, they might use the “frontal” method, which is essentially slowing down the free players’ progress.

On the other hand, the presence of esports has indirectly opened up new business opportunities for game developers and can even extend the lifespan of their games. One of the reasons why this can happen is that esports games are usually very accessible.

As you have seen from the title, most games with successful esports scenes are free. Because the game is free-to-play, players can access the game as long as they meet the minimum specification required to run the game (which is usually much lower than paid premium games).

We can take VALORANT, released in 2020, as an example. VALORANT can be run with only an Intel HD GPU, which is built into the processor. FIFA 21, on the other hand, is a paid game that also requires an external GPU (adding to the total cost of the game) in the form of a GeForce GTX 660 and a Radeon HD 7850.

The two games have their respective esports scene. But which of the two are more popular? As you have probably guessed, it is VALORANT. Games with easy access (free-to-play and low hardware specification requirements) have more potential in attracting new players rather than games with difficult access (paid and high hardware specification requirements). As a result, VALORANT was able to accumulate up to 478 thousand viewers on Twitch, while FIFA 21 merely reached 82 thousand viewers, according to twitchtracker.com.

There are several steps in the monetization process of free-to-play games. Low specs and free games first attract new players (with little to no effort). These players slowly become viewers or enthusiasts through watching streamers or tips and tricks contents. Tournaments and leagues can then be presented to these viewers and commercialize them in the form of sponsorships, media licenses, or other investments from external parties.

Let us take Riot Games’ League of Legends as an illustration. If you frequently follow Hybrid’s news, you can see the abundance of deals Riot got in 2020 alone. Riot collaborated with many popular brands in various fields ranging from fashion such as Louis Vuitton, AAPE, tech companies like Cisco, to music brands such as Universal Studios and Spotify. These brands are willing to make a deal with Riot because it has the capability to ammas an audience of 44 million people during the 2019 LoL World Championship. Therefore, it is not surprising that Riot Games decided to make esports one of the pillars of their business rather than just a marketing tool.

Riot Games’ achievements are living proof that esports is a more sustainable and profitable monetization method for free-to-play game publishers.

Dota 2 can also be another example of a game that thrives from the presence of esports. Valve sells a Battle Pass (containing various skin and cosmetics) on a yearly basis and uses 25% of the sales to increase the prize pool of The International (TI). Valve raised US$40 million from The International Battle Pass last year. Keep in mind that this is only 25%. The remaining 75% of the Battle Pass sales are going directly to Valve’s pocket. You can imagine how much Valve is profiting from the esports monetization model alone.

Making games that are free-to-play, especially when it is integrated with a healthy esports ecosystem, has been proven to be an effective business model. Esports also provides a lot of commercialization potential by building the interest of external parties to invest in the game. It can also incentivize players to buy in-game content, like Dota 2’s Battle Pass, that will support their favorite team and the overall esports ecosystem.

 

Why Are Other Monetization Systems Less Successful In Building Esports Ecosystems?

I have previously discussed the factors behind the success of competitive esports games. If you have read that article, you will also find the ease of access to the particular game is key to its esports growth.

The price of the game and minimum spec requirements are the two elements that affect the accessibility of a game. In the end, the number of players in a game will always be determined by how high the entry barrier is set by the game developer/publisher. The lower the price and the device specifications, the greater the market potential the game can amass. Referring back to the VALORANT vs. FIFA 21 argument, VALORANT is superior in terms of player numbers since the game is free, while FIFA 21 costs IDR 849,000. VALORANT can also run without an external GPU, while FIFA 21 requires the use of an external GPU.

FIFA 21 also has esports tournaments, but its growth has been severely limited due to the less affordable prices of the game and the requirement of higher PC specs than free-to-play games.

With regards to the different approaches of game developers I mentioned earlier, we can take Nintendo as a case study. The Smash Bros community frequently complained to Nintendo due to the lack of financial support they receive in Smash tournaments. On one occasion, Nintendo even expresses its unwillingness to invest in esports.

Despite Super Smash Bros having a massive following of loyal fans, Nintendo still does not want to capitalize on the esports income strategy. This notion is especially true for developers who already had success using the pay model. After all, if Nintendo already generated significant revenue from the sales of Super Smash Bros alone, why would it bother to risk investing in an esports scene?

Shuntaro Furukawa, Nintendo’s president who previously expresses his standpoint about the Super Smash Bros esports scene. Source: Time

On the other hand, developers releasing free-to-play games (which obviously cannot rely on game sales) will need an alternative source of income. Selling skins can be one way of generating revenue, but it will most likely not cover the operating cost of the game. Developers can also use the aforementioned “exploitative” monetization methods. For example, Riot Games can make a champion unlockable on a certain level, which indirectly forces players to pay to level up faster. However, these types of monetization model has been shown to not be sustainable in the long-term.

Indeed, cultivating an esports ecosystem requires significant investment and is not always guaranteed to be profitable. However, when proper and careful steps are taken, we have seen how many developers thrive solely from their esports scenes. As Riot Games CEO Nicolo Laurent once said, “We no longer see esports as just marketing, but as a business.” Nicolo also added, “we want to make sure everybody has something to win.” From Nicolo’s statements, it is clear how esports has a wider economic impact compared to micro-transactions or the pay-to-win model.

Conclusion

From this discussion, we have explored why free-to-play games, when integrated with esports, can bring many income benefits for the game developers.  Esports also have the potential to build players’ loyalty, extend the lifespan of a game, and bring commercialization interests from external parties

So, should all free-to-play games have an esports scene? Well, not exactly. After all, the game’s direction is solely dependent on the developer’s goals and focus. For example, Clash of Clans still managed to persist until today (although its popularity is declining) without the esports monetization model. Riot Games, a developer famous for its thriving esports scene, still prioritizes making high-quality games rather than focusing on esports.

I very much agree with Riot’s philosophy here. After all, esports is the product of a game. A high-quality, creative, and well-balanced game will naturally produce a competitive esports scene. Thus, developers should put more effort in perfecting their game and player experience, then an expansion to the esports scene will automatically follow.

The original article is written by Akbar Priono

The Success Story of Moonton and Mobile Legends in Indonesia

The recent acquisition of Moonton by Bytedance sparks the question about the company’s future and the fate of MLBB’s esports ecosystem. In this article, Aswin Atonie, Brand Manager of Moonton Indonesia, also shared his insights about the direction of the company’s development. Before all of that, however, let’s take a step back into the past and observe the path that Moonton took to reach its success.

Moonton’s Arduous Path in Raising Its Golden Child, Mobile Legends: Bang-Bang

According to Moonton Games’ official LinkedIn page, Shanghai Moonton Co., Ltd was founded in 2014 as a software company and, eventually, shifted its focus into game development. Moonton’s first game was called Magic Rush: Heroes, which has the generic gameplay collecting heroes through gacha.

A year after the release of Magic Rush: Heroes, Moonton released a new game we all know today as Mobile Legends. Back in 2016, the game was released under the name Mobile Legends: 5v5 MOBA, which got renamed to Mobile Legends: Bang Bang soon after.

Competitive mobile games (especially the MOBA genre) are still relatively new and underdeveloped in 2016, prompting many game developers to take the early opportunity to jump into the genre. For example, other than Mobile Legends, Vainglory was released by a new developer called Super Evil Megacorp. Gameloft, a well-established game development company, also created its own version of mobile MOBA called Heroes of Order and Chaos. 

Unfortunately, Moonton’s journey in developing Mobile Legends had a rough start, facing a number of controversies in the early years.

In the early versions of Mobile Legends, the game was argued to appear unoriginal and copied ideas from other franchises. For example, back then, Alucard very much looked like Dante from the Devil May Cry series. Akai also appeared as a panda wearing pants and carrying an iron ball, which has a slight resemblance to Po from the Kung Fu Panda movie. Franco also arguably a direct copy of Pudge from Dota 2.

Interestingly, there were no complaints or lawsuits coming from the organizations that owned Dota 2, Kung Fu Panda, or Devil May Cry. However, one particular game developer, Riot Games, does have something to say about Moonton’s growing franchise.

Riot Games launched a lawsuit against Moonton in the central court of California, United States, on June 7, 2017. At that time, Riot Games accused Mobile Legends: 5v5 MOBA and Magic Rush of copying or mimicking League of Legends. In its court documents, Riot provided several screenshots that shows the similarity of the content between League of Legends and Moonton’s games. Here are some examples of the accused plagiarism, taken directly from the official court documents,

Some snippets of plagiarism allegations in Riot Games’ legal prosecution documents against Moonton in 2017. Apart from Mobile Legends, Riot Games also considers Magic Rush: Heroes to have copied League of Legends. Source: Dot Esports
Another excerpt from Riot Games’ prosecution documents towards Moonton. This time, Riot Games provides a comparison between LoL’s content and Mobile Legends’ content. Source: Dot Esports

 

According to the Dot Esports article published in 2018, Riot Games’ lawsuit ended in a forum non-conveniens. In these circumstances, the case is dismissed because the California court considers that another area of jurisdiction will be better suited to deal with the action. Since Moonton is based in China, the lawsuit will be adjudicated in the high court of China.

After Riot’s allegations, Moonton faced yet another lawsuit in 2018, which was filed by Tencent against Xu Zhenhua, one of Moonton’s representatives.

Dot Esports claimed that Xu Zhenhua was sued because he was deemed to have violated the non-disclosure (prohibition of submitting confidential information) and non-compete agreement (prohibition of moving to a rival company in the same field). The lawsuit initially ended with Xu Zhenhua being fined 2.6 million Yuan (approximately Rp. 5.5 billion). However, further speculation by Dot Esports’ internal source suggests that the fine got raised to about 19.4 million Yuan (approximately Rp. 42 billion).

Despite all the hard-fought trials and tribulations that Moonton went through to develop MLBB, it eventually rose over its problems and grew to the giant franchise we know of today. However, before discussing the reasons behind MLBB’s success, let’s take a look at the fate of Moonton’s other games.

 

Other Moonton Games That Did Not Have the Same Degree of Success as MLBB

As I mentioned earlier, Moonton has released other titles in the past. Besides Magic Rush: Heroes, Moonton created Mobile Legends: Adventure and Sweet Crossing: Snake.io

Mobile Legends: Adventure can be considered to be more of a casual game. Similar to Magic Rush, the gameplay of ML: Adventure is an automated turn-based RPG and also applies the concept of gacha with hero collections. Sweet Crossing: Snake.io is also a game suited for casuals. It has very similar gameplay to Snake.io, which was popular among local streamers, but filled with cute animal characters.

However, these games never reached the same degree of popularity as Mobile Legends, perhaps due to the absence of an esports ecosystem. According to Google Play, Sweet Crossing, ML: Adventure, and Magic Rush, only had around 10 million installs at the time of writing this article. On the other hand, MLBB surpasses all of them by a mile, already reaching more than 100 million installs.

Sweet Crossing, one of the games made by Moonton that is very different from the previous games released by the company. Image Source – Google Play Store

The total downloads per month of the three games are actually quite decent. Using data from Sensor Tower, Sweet Crossing recorded a total of 1 million downloads on the Google Play Store worldwide in February 2021, while Mobile Legends: Adventure and Magic Rush: Heroes accumulated 400 thousand downloads and 20 thousand downloads, respectively. However, these figures are relatively insignificant when compared to MLBB, which has over 5 million worldwide downloads on the Google Play Store in February 2021.

MLBB is arguably already ingrained in the current Indonesian culture. Every day, there is always some news that is somewhat related to MLBB. These news include information about the game, such as new hero releases, Starlight, or the latest skins, to esports content, rumors, and gossip. Furthermore, a great deal of MLBB news is not released by Moonton itself, but rather by local content creators, media, pro players, and Moonton partners.

All the other three games released by Moonton do have some degree of success. After all, reaching 10 million downloads on Google Play Store is not at all an easy feat. However, MLBB is simply on another incomparable level when it comes to success, and the three games will never be able to compete with MLBB despite having decent social media followers. Why is this exactly?

In my opinion, esports is one of the biggest factors that come into play in this matter. Esports makes the discussion of the MLBB ecosystem much more interesting. Without esports, Mobile Legends’ news will only be filled with patch updates, hero releases, tips and tricks, skins, or Starlight membership.

But with the presence of esports, the Mobile Legends game has various engaging topics of discussion, ranging from rumors or gossip, pro player’s opinions (team rivalries, in-game meta), post-match interviews, and so on.

Furthermore, MLBB tournaments in Indonesia have a league format that is routinely held every week. As a result, new content and drama is constantly produced to spice up the ecosystem and the news surrounding MLBB.

The presence of esports brings a lot of content and attention to MLBB. There are also many MLBB tournaments watch parties that bring new conversations or opinions related to the game. Image Source – Nimo TV’s Facebook page

On the flip side, the other three games made by Moonton have a more casual and simple gameplay. As a result, there are rarely any competitive aspects or drive that can arise through these games. 

Therefore, esports is perhaps the primary reason behind the MLBB’s rise to popularity in Indonesia. If you want to look more into the positive impacts that an esports ecosystem can bring to free-to-play games, you can read the following article.

 

The Mutualistic Relationship Between MLBB and the Indonesian Esports Ecosystem

MLBB and the Indonesian esports market have benefitted from each other’s existence, hence the mutualistic relationship. To understand why this is the case, we need to take a look at the development of the Indonesian esports ecosystem.

As I have previously stated, the presence of MLBB might have single-handedly resurrected Indonesian esports. One of these “revival” moments was greatly felt during MSC 2017 and MPL Season 1 in 2018, held in Taman Anggrek Mall.

These two tournaments succeeded in showing the huge potential of the gaming and esports market in Indonesia. As an illustration, normal esports events held at Taman Anggrek can usually fill the whole 1st-floor atrium of the mall. However, MSC 2017 and MPL Indonesia Season 1 were able to fill the whole mall with esports enthusiasts. People were watching from the floors above, and some even deliberately stayed in the elevator to watch the tournament. Amazing, isn’t it?

In October 2020, I also briefly discussed why Indonesia was able to overtake other regions and become superior in mobile game esports. According to the Esports Charts, MPL Indonesia was also able to beat several major international tournament in viewership numbers. In February 2021 alone, MPL Indonesia had more viewers than older esports leagues such as the Korean LCK LoL league or the biggest CS:GO tournament, IEM Katowice. 

We can clearly see the impact that MLBB and Moonton have brought into Indonesian esports. Although sometimes ML is considered “only popular in Indonesia”,  the Indonesian esports community has to inevitably thank Moonton for being the main catalyst of the ecosystem’s growth.

One of the effects of the growth of the Indonesian esports ecosystem is the increasing number of game developers investing in the local market. To my knowledge, there were almost no game developers directly investing in the Indonesian market before the MSC 2017 phenomenon. 

However, proceeding the event, Tencent entered the Indonesian market in 2018 with PUBG Mobile. Several years later, in 2020, giants like Riot Games even penetrated directly into the local market through games like VALORANT and Wild Rift. In the case of Wild Rift, Indonesia (and other countries in SEA) even received a “special treatment” through the earlier access to the beta release compared to the Western and East Asian regions.

Moonton also gave way for the massive development of local Indonesian esports teams or organizations. Many local esports organizations, big or small, can grow and thrive thanks to MLBB. Indonesian esports teams are also able to compete and get achievements on the international stage. You can see this example in my discussion about RRQ Hoshi’s position as the most popular and successful MLBB team.

MLBB was also considered as an impetus of the largely growing RRQ’s fan base. | Source: ONE Esports

Earlier I mentioned that the relationship between Moonton’s MLBB and Indonesia’s esports scene is mutualistic, which suggests that Moonton also benefited greatly from its penetration into the Indonesian market.

Why is the Indonesian market very profitable for Moonton and MLBB? Why do Moonton and MLBB need Indonesia? Well, despite Moonton being based in China, MLBB surprisingly did not get released in China itself.

If you frequently follow Hybrid’s discussion about the development of the game industry, you will certainly understand the importance of the Chinese market. In short, China’s rapid development of gaming culture and technological advancements essentially acts as a gold mine for game developers. If you discover more about this topic, you can read the following discussion on Hybrid.co.id conducted by Ellavie.

To see why the Chinese market is considered incredibly lucrative by most developers, we need to take a look at some data. Sensor Tower had investigated mobile games with the most revenue throughout 2020 and found that PUBG Mobile and Honor of Kings were the two top-ranking ones.

PUBG Mobile was released globally (including in China) and raised $2.6 billion USD. However, Honor of Kings, which was only released in China, managed to collect revenue of $2.5 billion USD. You read that right, a game released exclusively in China can almost beat an internationally published game when it comes to revenue. Therefore, you can clearly see the scale of profitability and income that the Chinese market can bring.

Because MLBB was not able to be released in China, Moonton had to find another country with a market that can bring the same level of profitability. Eventually, Moonton found Indonesia. We also interviewed Moonton about the story behind Moonton’s market penetration into Indonesia.

Moonton Indonesia, represented by Aswin Atonie as its Brand Manager, replied, “The penetration into the Indonesian market has been carefully meticulously planned for a long time. We did various research and analysis before concluding that Indonesia’s gaming industry is essentially an empty canvas that is vastly open for development.”

Aswin Atonie, Brand Manager for Moonton Indonesia. Image Source – ONE Esports

Aswin Atonie also revealed a little behind-the-scenes story of MSC 2017. “From our studies, we prepared our breakthrough into the market through MLBB South East Asia Cup (MSC 2017), which actually has been planned since the first launch of MLBB in 2016. As we have expected, the event bore fruit and received great interest from the Indonesian fans.”

Without a doubt, Moonton’s decision to penetrate the Indonesian esports market brought in tremendous success. Through another interview conducted by Hybrid’s editor, Aswin Atonie revealed that Mobile Legends accumulated 1 billion downloads with 100 million active users today. According to an article published by ONE Esports in 2019, 31 million of those active users were from Indonesia.

The mutualistic relationship between Moonton and the Indonesian ecosystem that still holds to this very day has brought them both to the spotlight. If MLBB did not emerge as a phenomenon in 2017, the Indonesian gaming and esports market could stagnate without any skyrocketing developments. Likewise with Moonton, if it failed to realize the potential of the Indonesian gaming market, it may not have achieved the same degree of success today.

Now, the last thing we need to discuss is Moonton’s future ahead. What path of development do you think Moonton will take in the upcoming years? Will it continue to survive and grow only through Mobile Legends? Or will Moonton try to improvise and create new games in new genres?

 

Bytedance Acquisition, New Games, and Moonton’s Future

With the Moonton’s recent acquisition by Bytedance, this sub-topic is probably the most interesting to discuss today. In terms of MLBB game development, we saw the positive improvements of MLBB through project NEXT. Various elements in the game are improved, old heroes are updated or revamped, and in-game visuals are also upgraded while maintaining the non-graphic-intensive nature of MLBB.

With regards to esports, we can see how the Mobile Legends Professional League continues to grow in Indonesia. There is an ever-growing number of viewers, the commercial side is also constantly improving, and the scene continues to develop the competitive perspective as well. From a business standpoint, we, of course, already knew about the recent buzz of the acquisition of Bytedance (TikTok’s parent company).

With all the achievements that Moonton has achieved at this point, what will be Moonton’s next step? The recent Moonton acquisition has also spawned even more questions.

Although Aswin Atonie did touch upon this topic in our interview, he was not allowed to comment on the changes that will occur after the Bytedance acquisition. Fortunately, he did give us some hints about the direction of Moonton’s future development. Firstly, he discussed the potential of creating a new game. We already knew that Moonton has released other games such as Mobile Legends: Adventure and Sweet Crossing. However, does Moonton have any plans to dive into other competitive genres such as Battle Royale, FPS, or Digital Card Games?

“We always want to be updated with the latest trends in the game industry, but currently our focus won’t be shifting from the MOBA genre. We strongly believe that there are still countless aspects that we can develop in MLBB.” Aswin explained

“In the development of MLBB, we still focus greatly on improving player experience through the implementation various features, in-game updates, and events that we regularly release such as 515 e-Party, Project NEXT, Winter Gala, and so on. Behind the scenes, however, we (Moonton) are also currently developing other games. Information related to this will, of course, only be shared when the game is considered ready.” Aswin continued, explaining Moonton’s next plan in terms of game development.

The next question that comes to mind is the idea of expanding the MLBB market and esports to other countries. As I have explained before, even though MLBB has grown and developed tremendously, the scope of the game is mostly limited in the Southeast Asian region.

“We certainly want to continue to expand the market, and we already have specific plans for each region. Currently, we have two designated teams each responsible for managing the Developed Area, such as Southeast Asia, and Developing Area, such as Europe, the United States, and East Asia.” Aswin answered.

Despite its expansions proposals, Moonton still intends to put much of its resources into the Indonesian ecosystem. “We want to keep developing the esports ecosystem in Indonesia by educating the public perspective when it comes to the negative stigma of gaming, as well as inspiring the younger generation to play with a purpose. I feel that, so far, MLBB has opened up so many job opportunities in the esports sector, such as being an esports athlete, gaming content creator, esports team management, event management, and so on.”

Before closing the discussion with Aswin, I also asked about the possibility of Moonton exploring the world of console games in the future.  Aswin answered that “As a business player in the game industry, we believe that PC and console games will continue to develop in the future. But, of course, we still want to capitalize on the current expanding mobile era. Therefore, as of now, Moonton will only be focusing on developing MLBB into a mobile game that provides the best player experience.”

That wraps up Moonton’s Cinderella story who had a rocky start followed by a period of exponential growth which propelled it to success. Hopefully, Moonton’s journey can be an inspiration for all of you who are currently looking to invest and grow a business in the esports or gaming industry.

Featured Image – Moonton Epic Con 2019 (Source – Moonton Official). The original article is written by Akbar Priono